|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-1-19 12:33:35
|
显示全部楼层
论文摘要
4.2 ADDITIONAL POWER SWING DETECTION METHODS. ~) N6 H* B$ g& k$ z) O+ j
4.2.1 Continuous Impedance Calculation
0 w6 v1 \2 `; O vThis method determines a power swing condition based on a continuous impedance calculation.# u, d- O% t, I
Continuous here means, for example, that for each 5 ms step an impedance calculation is
f+ ^$ A$ O6 d/ g0 B, bperformed and compared with the impedance calculation of the previous 5 ms. As soon as there is
* F! }! H/ T8 f7 p9 F6 p0 Sa deviation, an out-of-step situation is assumed but not proven yet. The next impedance that* P2 X2 C9 x7 l1 z9 g' e/ v! ]
should be calculated 5 ms later is predicted based on the impedance difference of the previous
8 @+ X; `/ k4 U( V- G& V0 rmeasured impedances. If the prediction is correct, then it is proven that this is traveling impedance.
/ U8 H D4 R$ u+ g9 }In this situation a power swing condition is detected. For security reasons additional predictive
4 X2 c1 W( A% C9 O0 G F2 b! }calculations may be required.# I3 I7 {. U: v) R3 P. h6 `
A delta impedance setting is not required anymore, because the algorithm automatically considers
, P- _9 l! ^) Q7 p# ~2 Wany delta impedance that is measured between two consecutive calculations and sets the delta
* ~* S9 R& ~) ]( ^2 i% Pimpedance for the next calculation automatically in relation to the previous calculation. This leads
, J: {& O. y; {to a dynamic calculation of the delta impedance and an automatic adaptation to the change of the3 D# P4 _( c4 }' ?& c" X9 ]
power swing impedance. Also the delta time setting is not required anymore because it is
& x* b1 k3 l$ m. fdetermined by the calculation cycles of the algorithm.
2 D. }4 k( S" NR
/ V" |" U' x: e: p9 s2 v) T: J+ `X
* ? h4 h/ Z, \# ?" p0 t5 k2 g1 p% zStable power swing% t/ M7 A/ k! t: I5 ?; B n
impedance trajectory! B/ Z2 M# K+ n
DZ1 DZ2 DZ3
% u' T4 Y. G7 i4 h" k6 w wLoad
- l2 L Q0 u# hFigure 7 Power swing detection with continuous impedance calculation* ~# C( Q& y6 N) G; a! ]* ?
As long as the changing impedance vector is not approaching a tripping zone faster than the relay
- L9 c5 X- {: J" Q) Z5 C8 P1 Fcan confirm the out-of-step condition (at least 3 calculations 10 ms) the detection will be successful.- O: \9 H' \: N0 }4 D' T. R. I6 U
POWER SWING AND OUT-OF-STEP CONSIDERATIONS ON TRANSMISSION LINES
4 t6 p$ H5 t9 \0 w5 ? Z/ ]IEEE PSRC WG D6
! D# h2 r. M$ y3 _. Q# H7 Y$ s' s$ Z17 / 59 2005-07-19; `: V; c, M$ ~+ h& b
4.2.2 Swing-Center Voltage and its Rate of Change, e7 q V E% z4 P* H4 f
Swing-center voltage (SCV) is defined as the voltage at the location of a two-source equivalent
# e: n5 }: V' m2 l9 [. Y. u3 o% lsystem where the voltage value is zero when the angles between the two sources are 180 degrees
7 z8 c0 c) S5 n8 u7 Sapart. When a two-source system loses stability and goes into an OOS situation after some
4 s$ L# w4 s8 ndisturbance, the angle difference of the two sources, d(t), will increase as a function of time. Figure! a/ e; @; Z: |$ Q7 [3 f
8 illustrates the voltage phasor diagram of a general two-source system, with the SCV shown as
9 A+ E* D S- d/ {0 [" athe phasor from origin o to the point o'.
$ ~6 _; |- m2 q- ^# q# Wo'
0 } N. z; o* l! s9 j3 Qo3 ~1 k1 e0 ^9 U6 ^' N9 d6 l
o"* g+ q( }9 w0 ]: r
Z1S•I Z1L•I4 @( L7 C7 t5 C
VS
5 x# }8 a: r( _3 \* Y2 P6 bj ER& O3 i; U7 u5 n C. F; S" J2 f
d
; e/ x+ z0 j5 E4 I, Z3 g% KSCV
" Q0 |% Y- i: U, @Z1R•I
( w) {9 R# ?& U$ n5 r4 N5 U- q pq: e1 Y7 R$ c4 x/ X
I
/ \6 ^0 K: q4 j+ L" _) AES. J! M6 M" ?8 h; p
VR8 ~& K }" o: e
Figure 8 Voltage Phasor Diagram of a Two-Source System
1 B0 }4 Q, h n1 A+ dAn approximation of the SCV can be obtained through the use of locally available quantities as- V2 k3 ^* P0 x! K9 w0 T
follows:
B* P9 C. k9 H/ bSCV »| V | ×cosj S (6)0 T; X6 x- G$ R7 l, z7 ^
Where |VS| is the magnitude of locally measured voltage, and j is the angle difference between VS) p& J/ x4 r, d: ]
and the local current as shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9, we can see that Vcosj is a projection of VS
! m' F4 {( y8 oonto the axis of the current, I. For a homogeneous system with the system impedance angle, q,
3 S2 _# s. X. {" ~" A% `! E' T& Y# U) x/ Wclose to 90 degrees, Vcosj approximates well the magnitude of the swing-center voltage. For the
8 B3 N- B3 t; epurpose of power-swing detection, it is the rate of change of the SCV that provides the main$ a$ \, r) q }# |3 A; m
information of system swings. Therefore, some differences in magnitude between the system SCV
6 E* r6 O' p6 Band its local estimate have little impact in detecting power swings. Ilar [6] first introduced the
0 m# p1 ^. ^( S$ nquantity of Vcosj for power swing detection. |
|