|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-1-19 12:33:35
|
显示全部楼层
论文摘要
4.2 ADDITIONAL POWER SWING DETECTION METHODS3 O) n8 A' k6 U0 P' K, g: d
4.2.1 Continuous Impedance Calculation. U* z9 r3 a7 R+ f& N& D% N7 J+ ]
This method determines a power swing condition based on a continuous impedance calculation.
" E9 l. r7 m. [6 X" T5 ~- fContinuous here means, for example, that for each 5 ms step an impedance calculation is& A. \( N9 _, @. T* Y( V& D
performed and compared with the impedance calculation of the previous 5 ms. As soon as there is6 ?+ E9 L3 z' N7 V, @ E6 C
a deviation, an out-of-step situation is assumed but not proven yet. The next impedance that$ E; W4 j; G0 }
should be calculated 5 ms later is predicted based on the impedance difference of the previous
) ?3 y2 y y; n# _) Omeasured impedances. If the prediction is correct, then it is proven that this is traveling impedance.
( R( d* X$ _1 O5 YIn this situation a power swing condition is detected. For security reasons additional predictive
) H% M8 q# y7 {1 ]. V1 u" ycalculations may be required.
" r1 e& t9 N# K7 _: NA delta impedance setting is not required anymore, because the algorithm automatically considers
) H+ } {* E- N% Q: Rany delta impedance that is measured between two consecutive calculations and sets the delta$ M9 x# N9 W- _7 C' }' L d
impedance for the next calculation automatically in relation to the previous calculation. This leads5 I0 R# r- m. F; V) U0 f* Y, e% p
to a dynamic calculation of the delta impedance and an automatic adaptation to the change of the5 u8 d4 G; ?- D7 r4 K% u( M, d! [
power swing impedance. Also the delta time setting is not required anymore because it is; q6 L- \* \0 N! K3 `
determined by the calculation cycles of the algorithm.
, K9 {$ ~; u, |% U. a8 Z/ _; ]R4 K! j; p; _% U7 g" u. F f, I
X6 {5 h& x/ d" K8 B6 |3 \) b9 |
Stable power swing3 x( w6 N6 }! U4 c, m* V1 H
impedance trajectory
1 I5 h+ P# G" ]0 Z- M9 V! yDZ1 DZ2 DZ3
3 E/ Q" C z4 R2 w( r5 x# \Load
1 j0 U( _( f) O% l3 L* t# Z( _Figure 7 Power swing detection with continuous impedance calculation# A- A1 u- A0 P5 U! O2 P
As long as the changing impedance vector is not approaching a tripping zone faster than the relay `. A# t- q. |5 ?; }7 g
can confirm the out-of-step condition (at least 3 calculations 10 ms) the detection will be successful.
8 P% N" ?. h2 c* r X8 _. @4 w+ M3 C& HPOWER SWING AND OUT-OF-STEP CONSIDERATIONS ON TRANSMISSION LINES! v& B' s$ b0 _' G
IEEE PSRC WG D6
7 Y8 f. Q- @. i* j! l; m( ~17 / 59 2005-07-199 ` ]; m3 ~8 C: y: x* X; Y: M
4.2.2 Swing-Center Voltage and its Rate of Change
1 T1 H5 }- \" M+ ^Swing-center voltage (SCV) is defined as the voltage at the location of a two-source equivalent
% F0 G* K3 O2 x; C/ Dsystem where the voltage value is zero when the angles between the two sources are 180 degrees
. S5 }" S0 x6 j9 n% Iapart. When a two-source system loses stability and goes into an OOS situation after some
0 G0 K% g6 T8 m9 gdisturbance, the angle difference of the two sources, d(t), will increase as a function of time. Figure8 k( b/ E$ b1 ~/ R; f) H
8 illustrates the voltage phasor diagram of a general two-source system, with the SCV shown as0 b- I+ d2 f5 p8 x2 _- C
the phasor from origin o to the point o'.
9 k) Z7 U# |, {o'9 N: @) r9 ]1 ~# A, y. ` H
o$ m2 e5 f$ i8 y, ]
o"" i9 T2 Y" \ A- G9 c
Z1S•I Z1L•I
- R" |% f+ x" u/ w1 L" v. S! IVS: f# L6 j8 B- j7 {
j ER# c5 H' o. C: Y5 a, b
d8 k4 [) a9 N: t- d& U# o9 x
SCV k2 {+ \; {3 W+ B! C
Z1R•I
5 E& i5 q8 t/ u" D/ \: |q
" \8 q+ s3 L) |I2 q0 e! S: S% X9 i- s
ES1 v- \8 k6 ~: y; [* X2 v6 q
VR
) p! L* p; Q% N9 XFigure 8 Voltage Phasor Diagram of a Two-Source System! [. b. s1 P. _& r
An approximation of the SCV can be obtained through the use of locally available quantities as3 @- q9 u7 ?+ l& `3 z5 K
follows:* w) W0 J) P, U( P* U5 `' H9 ]4 A
SCV »| V | ×cosj S (6)
% A) G8 u7 O5 t) P5 {2 h3 @Where |VS| is the magnitude of locally measured voltage, and j is the angle difference between VS/ }6 |- b* x1 k5 U! a8 S; G
and the local current as shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9, we can see that Vcosj is a projection of VS5 N3 w* g1 d* i( e$ @0 i9 w* {* X; e
onto the axis of the current, I. For a homogeneous system with the system impedance angle, q,
7 f: d! ?( J3 E" N0 oclose to 90 degrees, Vcosj approximates well the magnitude of the swing-center voltage. For the
* a% O1 z* F4 s' R$ fpurpose of power-swing detection, it is the rate of change of the SCV that provides the main
% e, Q4 p3 L+ H& O5 [% n: sinformation of system swings. Therefore, some differences in magnitude between the system SCV
r9 u' m* _( Xand its local estimate have little impact in detecting power swings. Ilar [6] first introduced the6 e' z$ @+ {0 l. T
quantity of Vcosj for power swing detection. |
|