|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-1-19 12:33:35
|
显示全部楼层
论文摘要
4.2 ADDITIONAL POWER SWING DETECTION METHODS
/ N/ ^6 Z$ }, C& b c6 N5 n4.2.1 Continuous Impedance Calculation7 V4 J; P- m+ Y" G( H, P
This method determines a power swing condition based on a continuous impedance calculation.! K- f( {/ O) w$ H+ G1 ~% Z
Continuous here means, for example, that for each 5 ms step an impedance calculation is5 O+ N% d% m* u, e7 |$ i) z
performed and compared with the impedance calculation of the previous 5 ms. As soon as there is5 Y! p/ S9 S3 Q' u
a deviation, an out-of-step situation is assumed but not proven yet. The next impedance that
0 ] n7 f! s$ L' u0 K( h4 Q c% Eshould be calculated 5 ms later is predicted based on the impedance difference of the previous1 M) S; m& `3 I/ o, k$ o
measured impedances. If the prediction is correct, then it is proven that this is traveling impedance.: R8 l( L# z9 |; ^
In this situation a power swing condition is detected. For security reasons additional predictive
2 K7 u4 c& b9 q* U$ O" D/ ucalculations may be required.
# k/ Q" t6 q9 h# BA delta impedance setting is not required anymore, because the algorithm automatically considers/ n0 I3 V; `* D; Z: ]" ^" ^: }
any delta impedance that is measured between two consecutive calculations and sets the delta9 {; S7 G8 R: f/ D: S
impedance for the next calculation automatically in relation to the previous calculation. This leads
$ t$ {0 `' u) rto a dynamic calculation of the delta impedance and an automatic adaptation to the change of the3 x4 o, J( a6 l" _' A7 e2 s
power swing impedance. Also the delta time setting is not required anymore because it is
+ x, g7 I2 l7 N; K/ [1 rdetermined by the calculation cycles of the algorithm. i# Y7 D: x$ T- \4 I0 u$ b
R3 a' B1 T; S! E% A0 @. N B
X; W3 l! s" }; h' w d, `/ C9 d0 b
Stable power swing
! b& q2 Z, g4 }9 s+ v9 Y* a$ limpedance trajectory% ~- `! m( o. D r: L$ T5 L
DZ1 DZ2 DZ3
7 F/ W" s) H/ l( Q2 @( o dLoad* p% D3 I. ~( P
Figure 7 Power swing detection with continuous impedance calculation
* z% \0 |7 I, Z" f7 B) ^As long as the changing impedance vector is not approaching a tripping zone faster than the relay, u% t) x( u( n O
can confirm the out-of-step condition (at least 3 calculations 10 ms) the detection will be successful.
5 W& c* L) L1 ePOWER SWING AND OUT-OF-STEP CONSIDERATIONS ON TRANSMISSION LINES1 @3 _( A9 V7 E o3 W6 q
IEEE PSRC WG D6
$ v4 V" b9 i4 a% p# @4 ~( G17 / 59 2005-07-194 K0 p6 {! I( X" d2 h! c
4.2.2 Swing-Center Voltage and its Rate of Change
0 ]$ ?4 y- |4 u( ?0 ^Swing-center voltage (SCV) is defined as the voltage at the location of a two-source equivalent
- Z" R) d3 y/ v- F3 l) A/ Ssystem where the voltage value is zero when the angles between the two sources are 180 degrees, G5 V5 F) W* v2 K: m _
apart. When a two-source system loses stability and goes into an OOS situation after some# s. n) q) @+ P
disturbance, the angle difference of the two sources, d(t), will increase as a function of time. Figure" f: a& j' h C2 b
8 illustrates the voltage phasor diagram of a general two-source system, with the SCV shown as
$ a( V4 ?9 O* G) m4 O8 A( m. n/ ythe phasor from origin o to the point o'.
2 j8 e, [; [9 f* c! W, Ro'
# o3 J9 R5 `+ t; T9 Ao
6 K# V0 M! b/ ]* ao"
, l2 d9 j$ T4 P4 Q$ x7 nZ1S•I Z1L•I
. P( V# I2 n+ r g1 S3 r, BVS; e0 z P) ]& k# H3 h) X* R1 r
j ER
1 G+ Y# ^4 I( @8 vd; ~7 B, i @( v. |' \. w; S0 W" b
SCV
; Z4 [+ E/ P, {0 p( v9 K! b- D1 [Z1R•I
7 D# K* w# z6 X1 F& m+ H( x0 L4 d" N, Qq/ r4 P: R% v4 q2 l6 T" H
I
0 \- ?5 Y9 k# MES8 Z: x7 F5 y, a( i; }; ?1 [4 l
VR
0 M( j7 U4 }& c4 W4 cFigure 8 Voltage Phasor Diagram of a Two-Source System2 C; j* t2 _/ O Z3 y& z% R! r0 \
An approximation of the SCV can be obtained through the use of locally available quantities as
3 }6 _3 O. y) K3 y! x9 i% X2 Qfollows:
4 u5 M' B+ t) ? y2 USCV »| V | ×cosj S (6): v% O2 x. L: ]
Where |VS| is the magnitude of locally measured voltage, and j is the angle difference between VS1 \; b' F2 h# t; i7 ~
and the local current as shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9, we can see that Vcosj is a projection of VS
0 W2 u( L) @& Monto the axis of the current, I. For a homogeneous system with the system impedance angle, q,- j. Z6 D# j" O8 |/ }
close to 90 degrees, Vcosj approximates well the magnitude of the swing-center voltage. For the1 i j$ i! ^, t6 ?8 a+ A
purpose of power-swing detection, it is the rate of change of the SCV that provides the main$ ?; v B& @& }9 Z/ R: T# n# v2 W
information of system swings. Therefore, some differences in magnitude between the system SCV
' [% N4 T2 N* Wand its local estimate have little impact in detecting power swings. Ilar [6] first introduced the
! y% _# r9 v' h( j* J$ {* U H3 Fquantity of Vcosj for power swing detection. |
|