|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2008-1-19 12:33:35
|
显示全部楼层
论文摘要
4.2 ADDITIONAL POWER SWING DETECTION METHODS% h0 Y5 d3 h$ ~: u& w
4.2.1 Continuous Impedance Calculation
/ \" a, _1 Y6 `0 H: w# pThis method determines a power swing condition based on a continuous impedance calculation.
1 {) S! e, G2 Y2 w9 |) qContinuous here means, for example, that for each 5 ms step an impedance calculation is- `2 k* G* @0 X( k3 m$ Q, f1 t0 b
performed and compared with the impedance calculation of the previous 5 ms. As soon as there is* _, W+ s$ m. [
a deviation, an out-of-step situation is assumed but not proven yet. The next impedance that
; P# A2 T5 P' R. V j8 G* r7 B& tshould be calculated 5 ms later is predicted based on the impedance difference of the previous2 O% J) a. h& J* r% x
measured impedances. If the prediction is correct, then it is proven that this is traveling impedance.
/ b, r# b4 H! s+ \In this situation a power swing condition is detected. For security reasons additional predictive
6 P! K* q" V( V y8 O( }1 A) f+ Mcalculations may be required.
- J0 E$ T' b" [" |A delta impedance setting is not required anymore, because the algorithm automatically considers3 h- @2 F+ {& G- K
any delta impedance that is measured between two consecutive calculations and sets the delta+ O e% Y2 H! `$ @- L% O
impedance for the next calculation automatically in relation to the previous calculation. This leads
- P1 @ Z; A; B4 P# l/ H: _! M$ Ito a dynamic calculation of the delta impedance and an automatic adaptation to the change of the* k a/ R8 }( a* u" V
power swing impedance. Also the delta time setting is not required anymore because it is( ]0 D6 }" r% o; T5 z# q
determined by the calculation cycles of the algorithm.
# N6 B1 @+ Z1 t! ?% z( _R
8 F1 N) P' J) W, @6 ~9 o# bX6 }1 Z2 J( g7 T* s" I( J6 C
Stable power swing
" ~6 Q9 h; }! s* _impedance trajectory
- S0 c; c7 u. V% n- DDZ1 DZ2 DZ3
) ?: y i8 e+ c, U3 sLoad/ b4 D6 b8 ~) @- Z
Figure 7 Power swing detection with continuous impedance calculation
! u& c! l$ q0 G1 _$ }) y6 m1 eAs long as the changing impedance vector is not approaching a tripping zone faster than the relay" e7 A( w- S4 g. _$ P8 X
can confirm the out-of-step condition (at least 3 calculations 10 ms) the detection will be successful.( r9 ]% Y) w7 W+ x* }2 w& N! |
POWER SWING AND OUT-OF-STEP CONSIDERATIONS ON TRANSMISSION LINES
! ]+ c( k$ R% d5 |IEEE PSRC WG D6
" { J! a8 R' I2 q+ Q3 A6 _17 / 59 2005-07-19
7 y2 N0 j: D- h+ }8 k! b7 r4.2.2 Swing-Center Voltage and its Rate of Change
) P5 X3 |( `5 k1 i C" l+ L# R5 ?Swing-center voltage (SCV) is defined as the voltage at the location of a two-source equivalent" x, |6 j+ k. i( U
system where the voltage value is zero when the angles between the two sources are 180 degrees
. D5 T; Z+ w8 \4 W- a1 L9 Zapart. When a two-source system loses stability and goes into an OOS situation after some
6 m; Z7 G, n; t& A d0 K$ U# C8 Kdisturbance, the angle difference of the two sources, d(t), will increase as a function of time. Figure
t5 r, ~6 _9 j0 ^7 e8 illustrates the voltage phasor diagram of a general two-source system, with the SCV shown as
& z) Z( N. E" V+ P, ^. ]. a- }# c0 _the phasor from origin o to the point o'.
$ G4 ]2 n; b. z) Io'
1 m0 I* C' g- Y' e: ~6 G% zo2 Y5 r6 Q' w4 Q( c
o"
7 f6 ]( d& R, o8 T; ]# h {Z1S•I Z1L•I
2 O& {- h/ x$ @7 S6 SVS% y! \' a' a+ s5 _! U3 p
j ER
) F. T0 [/ o$ d2 t1 Q$ td
8 B+ l! C' q Q- e8 G5 cSCV
; S/ G8 L- g% b/ W' \* C2 ZZ1R•I
. l' k, T( n2 Z' aq1 W( V! g/ c, A, f4 l" b7 r2 D+ q
I( Y- Z" x4 Z/ a2 n) f' a0 F- t
ES
# x" q1 E, f# A n8 m$ @VR
; d3 t' P) O1 S& b, d; T5 Z8 g2 j' cFigure 8 Voltage Phasor Diagram of a Two-Source System
/ ?6 G5 k$ u& VAn approximation of the SCV can be obtained through the use of locally available quantities as
, e0 P2 P! P. |. U4 @follows:
" a" q3 u5 [7 w& pSCV »| V | ×cosj S (6)5 \$ ?& c, x. k7 @) f4 x" N
Where |VS| is the magnitude of locally measured voltage, and j is the angle difference between VS# u5 b) d+ I! K/ m- ?6 Z
and the local current as shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9, we can see that Vcosj is a projection of VS" V: P6 F0 V& b* D8 i' k# x$ ^
onto the axis of the current, I. For a homogeneous system with the system impedance angle, q,
% c3 B8 }! J3 F8 sclose to 90 degrees, Vcosj approximates well the magnitude of the swing-center voltage. For the
. n* n% i3 s' P, rpurpose of power-swing detection, it is the rate of change of the SCV that provides the main2 m8 y; o$ b. ^+ d3 N
information of system swings. Therefore, some differences in magnitude between the system SCV8 ?) D" \5 @# ?$ j$ r' o
and its local estimate have little impact in detecting power swings. Ilar [6] first introduced the" `* g- z/ O2 K
quantity of Vcosj for power swing detection. |
|