设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4626|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
    0 V. K7 [4 j0 x$ Q+ w& M- d6 E* V$ l; K
    Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,) U6 g4 q  X) o! Z
    the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,6 s1 o7 a2 C) E# ~& f
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    ) X7 Q* X0 R& x5 b- Y6 vgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at
    1 q- h  O: X7 l9 r% |# GMcGill University in June 2003.
    $ C( y' F1 |; q6 h" a- Q
    9 p& W& ?) W5 C- S3 z7 n0 u# d! OWhen I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
      ~! I, p" i: ?: l) a2 M. @1 {6 rago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,/ [* R) M$ t) \
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    9 }" Z/ W; j% N4 rcould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?1 p( l1 z  x# r% P, E/ ~
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the
    " Y' _* \$ I" c4 v- phands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start5 \* v# K* I2 T# W0 L
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or
    + x9 y1 ?  u/ fswim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    . n, x) y; Q; j7 ]3 Sthough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big1 C7 ]7 F- u$ [' e9 o
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    ! ]  [, C- {% }3 R  m  w* I/ T/ o: v, R! c8 ^
    Another lesson to be learned, to continue
    ! c$ f' y4 I3 p4 Z; cusing my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    3 v* x5 ]/ ~1 i7 U% k* n2 qwhile you are swimming and not sinking you
    # i  l3 s, b- Z* x  Gshould aim for rough water. When I was9 _9 B, H5 v% F1 g" a" \  K. g
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of
    4 c( a, K2 V7 L' [; QTechnology in the late 1960s, a student told
    7 X/ y8 O" U$ m* F" s0 zme that he wanted to go into general# P3 c5 W, N! ?' o+ ]: A% G
    relativity rather than the area I was working
    ! i6 P/ l5 y3 n  kon, elementary particle physics, because4 K: C. p3 A  C/ m8 D. w
    the principles of the former were well
    5 X% x) s9 I' }known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    7 f. y; b8 n5 N2 k# Jto him. It struck me that he had just given
    8 s' [. W- E$ B8 W1 ~a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.4 |( }# M, y+ I
    Particle physics was an area where
    4 W! X8 O+ S" b5 Q" T2 Ccreative work could still be done. It really was
    2 A, G" M7 g' I/ Y- {, ^0 r8 ca mess in the 1960s, but since that time the. T6 ^$ r/ N/ b* D6 ?0 o
    work of many theoretical and experimental, \% y! [1 b8 b* Y
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and! M( v% p: ]7 I
    put everything (well, almost everything)' X/ a) J4 z! K2 a
    together in a beautiful theory known as
    ( a+ p0 W5 ]# C# L5 m# X; D9 f1 Athe standard model.My advice is to go for the" F5 g- W+ C# l" C& r" s5 d. f- M
    messes — that’s where the action is.
    + \  \" W' _3 v3 d6 D8 T
    3 b$ |2 K- R3 {" r; F& tMy third piece of advice is probably the# D( M2 U9 b: B$ y! x9 n; r$ P' {
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for
    6 [/ Y+ d  c* g1 L1 Y& q# g0 Rwasting time. Students are only asked to
    1 O* M. p+ t! U6 ?- nsolve problems that their professors (unless
    3 ?/ m; t4 _& ^; ?% y4 m# Bunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In
    8 p+ S" B2 a7 F7 p. P: raddition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    6 Z9 P9 m  L* b+ R& J, s* k" Escientifically important — they have to be* e; Z6 [4 I& e
    solved to pass the course. But in the real
    $ A  _1 J3 U: w  w# |" F. I% oworld, it’s very hard to know which problems7 Y: O) q, j+ E# F
    are important, and you never know whether
    % v7 y% v2 ?6 V$ M5 d( i, \: S4 oat a given moment in history a problem is
    ! Q3 d! q8 E# n7 msolvable. At the beginning of the twentieth5 V+ u7 J4 u' c
    century, several leading physicists, including; V; Z% W, u; }6 w  L
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work( {: ]8 ?2 Q, ]+ t' d. W
    out a theory of the electron. This was partly$ S/ ]  W/ M; q, P1 }8 G
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    + a5 D, Y: G, ?/ x1 I% fdetect effects of Earth’s motion through the
    9 f8 t0 r4 B7 i: O/ }0 k6 ^% pether had failed. We now know that
    # M2 |4 |/ b* E6 x0 |# u" F' D- b1 F6 gthey were working on the wrong problem.
    9 ]0 t- e+ l/ QAt that time, no one could have developed a
    4 J$ |; f4 O& q' C# x( wsuccessful theory of the electron, because
    & z" _3 b* m7 V2 U7 H# M! O- n8 D8 i* Gquantum mechanics had not yet been
    $ b) M% e+ c8 @* Z6 c9 [  a: k" ]discovered. It took the genius of Albert+ h+ v) Q5 y" n7 i
    Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right
    ) g( j* A$ P& Vproblem on which to work was the effect
    / `& F+ x) ^3 n7 b9 ^" M8 T+ }of motion on measurements of space and
    ' ~; r5 b) H$ E0 `# Ztime. This led him to the special theory of
    ! X: L4 c+ Y2 j$ l& k" N$ N4 J& Qrelativity. As you will never be sure which
    2 G3 u$ C) s' Z! ~+ Aare the right problems to work on, most& @9 S) U1 `* m% i$ g8 G: V
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory) C# R- }/ W2 C
    or at your desk will be wasted. If you want! V4 f% k0 p" s* N4 n
    to be creative, then you will have to get used& u8 c* b1 _# @% p
    to spending most of your time not being
    : O6 G; y$ V# v, \* mcreative, to being becalmed on the ocean of/ `* X9 t5 v! y) ?# v! Y6 q! K
    scientific knowledge.
    1 O+ r) ]& G4 l* M4 p+ @0 d5 r; |! y
    Finally, learn something about the history
    ) ]% n5 X6 s% t8 @; g% Rof science,or at a minimum the history of your, v7 o9 i6 i: K6 r1 K
    own branch of science. The least important5 ]& H: O: M9 B, E% Q
    reason for this is that the history may actually: z9 _$ |3 U1 U$ A( o, W/ X: s
    be of some use to you in your own scientific" K. s5 i; B; Y% \% `/ w
    work. For instance, now and then scientists
    : O3 a. b2 |/ p7 Kare hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    7 E6 q! C& z0 Q- omodels of science that have/ S' H5 ^" `5 [
    been proposed by philosophers from Francis
    . V3 b! P1 B/ W' y: Y( QBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    0 c: |' f2 H: e4 F3 G/ d. F. mThe best antidote to the philosophy of science+ ?$ u% [& f% v) B7 G$ L
    is a knowledge of the history of science.
    - J) F4 \; r( V2 H( p- N2 g0 Q# S' sMore importantly, the history of science
    ( K. p. P) x7 L4 ican make your work seem more worthwhile- \! E' ], T" Y7 f$ T. Y/ G3 M
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    ) j# O/ U; M- u- T  A$ Z8 Wgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives  l0 O. C: i& ^0 Q4 s2 L% v* U5 k
    probably won’t understand what you’re
    4 R: D0 o% E- J6 l( B( h: h( F4 ]doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    # T. V  W; z8 \/ @% \; H6 ~2 Pparticle physics, you won’t even have the
    & U+ ^9 n# R! S. v& p" n; z* ^5 N. [satisfaction of doing something that is
    + |) e6 o& M- F% Y: E2 F. I0 Eimmediately useful. But you can get great
    ' |" o1 B0 W( |4 l9 q0 d" _satisfaction by recognizing that your work in1 W5 p; A+ l8 o" k
    science is a part of history.' J# T5 G* D. t# q' }$ J
    : F$ @% R1 N) ?1 M
    Look back 100 years, to 1903. How3 \; [! X5 a% X( T/ [. x
    important is it now who was Prime Minister
    9 e4 o3 {' C: _# l, F2 yof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    4 ?" r+ ?( n$ ?) X+ u9 w4 pUnited States? What stands out as really
    ! ^) Y& I" p7 Mimportant is that at McGill University,
    8 [2 I+ y" E& ]' M/ ~& D9 p, qErnest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were
    % Q# ]" p, |% [+ {5 o5 bworking out the nature of radioactivity.. L5 l6 `/ P4 x+ y% h
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,
    - ^+ W! B' j, rbut much more important were its
    : F) M, ^' {, `8 t7 J! ocultural implications. The understanding of
      y* u- F  @, ~radioactivity allowed physicists to explain/ W! J  D2 ^# `) [3 F; o
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    ! r& n# N5 P+ I9 b9 m7 ?hot after millions of years. In this way, it
    ; [1 a' R+ g8 wremoved the last scientific objection to what9 ]8 |$ L9 g% `7 |) @8 C/ i
    many geologists and paleontologists; C. m6 \3 R* X4 ^
    thought was the great age of the Earth and' b' O  B4 k2 x+ w9 Z$ q* ?
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either" B6 `+ P. l2 c. ]! b; T8 t+ |% S  h
    had to give up belief in the literal truth of& E/ D* I0 \+ b9 n
    the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual; c/ p# R+ Y! k
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a! e7 |5 c; |* v. W' k! ~, m8 t
    sequence of steps from Galileo through2 \* |5 v' _+ \2 }* Q1 `
    Newton and Darwin to the present that,time
    & G/ Y0 T  p! a) v9 u9 [after time,has weakened the hold of religious
    1 u* o  G- i4 {) i6 B( bdogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays9 E# x) y" ^2 A5 y% i
    is enough to show you that this work* N& e# Y5 V( R8 Q
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,9 h8 s! r, _6 M5 i  J
    of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    / S! H% L: V7 S1 ?/ v1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;$ u% `2 O+ k9 V6 ^" L( l+ R
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    1 c4 d# t5 c% X6 \! G3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    6 `  U# @* K6 e  P& T4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2025-5-13 03:20

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表