设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4970|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg+ _3 I; K! e% g( x$ U8 U& N0 _

    % W2 O. y/ X- B  T# O/ G& ?, `( qSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    ' ~, R3 \0 Q" j, f% vthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,* c; C  B' L' n* M0 V+ c
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    + M! H) F$ T8 b! agiven by the author at the Science Convocation at
    " z4 S) U: s+ y6 B$ n8 W# o! B% VMcGill University in June 2003.. y% B$ o& c+ T5 I' s& a

    : X$ z' |3 Y# T! |- @( mWhen I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    / r0 p% A& |6 M2 B5 Kago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,+ ?7 s! C4 h: J
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How( X1 n* n! G2 r# ]6 l4 D7 T3 [
    could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?7 g& c$ i0 g6 x
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the2 V5 L# K  T4 ~. T. o8 J: Q
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start' B& k9 |8 _; d3 \; Q; |- ^( G6 A% l6 y
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or
      ?: W- \- `) z6 cswim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —9 _3 F( a4 h% e& I4 g1 F
    though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big; w% F5 }, [0 D" ?* e' S+ t
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to ." ^8 ~1 J. z) I) S" b+ E

    9 o: w7 ]# Q4 F$ FAnother lesson to be learned, to continue: D# M, J6 G9 v  |" X/ Q& U
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    + a2 \$ i8 y1 h! f& X6 f. ?while you are swimming and not sinking you; C. x: k! D, R+ d0 L  z$ K7 J0 ~, F
    should aim for rough water. When I was
    . a5 P" E+ [' i# ~8 bteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of# D# X3 d$ w4 m: L1 U) @4 \
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told
    4 K# X8 |3 o6 A6 A. p$ m3 a, ~* Ume that he wanted to go into general
    4 [# g: V0 F6 s; i1 f0 r0 L( w' ?. ]relativity rather than the area I was working$ L1 ~; b$ S3 L* s! }
    on, elementary particle physics, because6 o3 {9 M. J4 `5 e
    the principles of the former were well
    7 o0 U( A$ z# c1 R# ]8 \* xknown, while the latter seemed like a mess: S; s  D- E3 Z: J; q
    to him. It struck me that he had just given" E* g/ O8 e7 D6 Z# N4 k
    a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.% n- Q" a7 U( O5 p) h
    Particle physics was an area where; a: l& `( Y! F- a1 ~! ?* U1 Z! t
    creative work could still be done. It really was; b5 T6 C$ T3 C( B
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the+ t% H1 U, l/ a* u$ Q& n
    work of many theoretical and experimental
    / d- _( X7 L9 K  ^9 Uphysicists has been able to sort it out, and
    - i" j$ p9 ?( @+ c. M) Eput everything (well, almost everything)( \5 R; J) j, x3 w
    together in a beautiful theory known as/ M9 E# T& @* _* g! M8 P6 A
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the
    / x& w) ^3 X$ T) q: hmesses — that’s where the action is.
    % `2 N& {# ]$ X2 {9 x
      h( s6 x, j- W9 a1 r. |+ P5 @" ~My third piece of advice is probably the
    - F5 H2 R+ u, H$ [2 w" x2 P3 @# Uhardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for
    0 N" l/ z; V% _, u; B0 Pwasting time. Students are only asked to
    ! m3 O" r! B0 k8 g5 ]5 @solve problems that their professors (unless
    . f7 R9 p* N5 Punusually cruel) know to be solvable. In- b% H- G- n: _$ b4 L$ f
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    1 }7 W' R% p; M& r+ tscientifically important — they have to be
    8 J; v$ }6 N, m4 W6 M: O1 }0 `solved to pass the course. But in the real3 x2 x9 u- T+ A) N# `
    world, it’s very hard to know which problems5 H: X$ Q) B% h$ I+ a9 T  r! m- v
    are important, and you never know whether
      O) w- O$ n6 y( ]; l' sat a given moment in history a problem is
    ( l! d. B8 U$ a& {: j. g( @solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    - B0 a8 F6 e: x, P# ccentury, several leading physicists, including2 `6 C& y6 {& T; f. ]$ R
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work' @6 J2 u& N! J0 m: }" Y3 E* v
    out a theory of the electron. This was partly
    . v7 G" O0 `# R$ U1 cin order to understand why all attempts to
    , Q7 P" A9 y$ G- Y/ C9 l% \detect effects of Earth’s motion through the
    $ `9 B! Z- S( f$ b6 nether had failed. We now know that$ J6 Q+ E% j+ b$ k$ F! |% v
    they were working on the wrong problem.
    ' ^( w  ~$ j9 P$ zAt that time, no one could have developed a6 p# K' `* y8 h; }3 ?
    successful theory of the electron, because& \' C8 [; B2 I+ |4 S# @2 W; w& a7 c
    quantum mechanics had not yet been* o2 A9 t6 m5 k  \
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert1 {' u6 ?; p$ E. s
    Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right
    % H$ d4 a" `! j9 X3 @problem on which to work was the effect
    * E. ^5 Z+ A: h3 T' L, @of motion on measurements of space and: Z# \7 V! s# `* ?9 @! e
    time. This led him to the special theory of  R7 E9 B/ f' l7 T" o5 j
    relativity. As you will never be sure which8 O" E& V. q; `# l* b; A: o
    are the right problems to work on, most4 r$ {8 D; f/ R2 x7 D( r. k8 R
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory0 k5 I4 I4 ^5 g+ }, x$ U6 o
    or at your desk will be wasted. If you want8 r4 ~) m4 i9 F
    to be creative, then you will have to get used1 l$ E4 Q) B3 I6 }
    to spending most of your time not being
    ! l- p& _" O4 [/ D" ^creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of: |, G1 U, ^# u
    scientific knowledge.
    7 W. Q5 @" R/ d  h' v$ I; d3 u7 ~) ?# |
    Finally, learn something about the history
    0 n( e. K& f" t; R" \" P+ l8 Iof science,or at a minimum the history of your
    ; o, X9 {( o+ L/ z1 S0 I% gown branch of science. The least important
    $ f- ^7 O- J, P) rreason for this is that the history may actually
    0 [' F6 j1 p$ Z' V) z! {' ^, w7 ibe of some use to you in your own scientific
    % N/ X" `6 J& F  \* h" Dwork. For instance, now and then scientists; r. |' z2 }) @7 q! d
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified9 |8 ^5 l- G: w6 m' w
    models of science that have3 i  ~5 O0 G8 X5 f* e" G
    been proposed by philosophers from Francis
    ) V. R7 ?# F# e1 @) ]1 H  r% H6 ]Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    0 N% ]/ A/ l+ L) ]The best antidote to the philosophy of science
    / R9 m# V% U# m$ kis a knowledge of the history of science.
    3 j$ \0 P* B$ t) S! DMore importantly, the history of science! D3 ?0 q" {$ D! B3 \
    can make your work seem more worthwhile3 b) B8 E# [8 H  ^
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    5 j9 f" Z! z- J6 @* qgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives
    5 W. w/ L+ t- {probably won’t understand what you’re* t+ m1 \, v' O/ X/ O3 T7 m
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    # Y, D; A: g6 j2 O1 P) [( cparticle physics, you won’t even have the& N: @- M# X# a. u/ m$ f) u; w; Z- z
    satisfaction of doing something that is$ @! |' _- t: k6 |4 T
    immediately useful. But you can get great
    8 c% q/ ]  e; I  m! w: R5 [2 ksatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    9 ~, J. Q9 X: m2 Wscience is a part of history." a, {) I9 h! O- ^* ~! F$ S

    & N  u, r1 y; s( _8 NLook back 100 years, to 1903. How4 t( u0 T0 M) [
    important is it now who was Prime Minister
    . d6 a" v, |' nof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
      v' Z- l5 \# ]United States? What stands out as really& `% O, Q0 b# T9 S. j7 }$ `  b
    important is that at McGill University,4 }% T- a  ?9 b
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were1 h8 v* w1 V4 B" o: j
    working out the nature of radioactivity.( {) d* s7 i+ w' }, q
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,$ s" ^9 _' d1 Q9 z4 Z$ t
    but much more important were its
    6 f! \. _% M8 E* c$ s) bcultural implications. The understanding of1 o% ^8 Y+ j2 f% H3 I) |
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain( Y, L! E( ~! y2 t6 B/ f" p
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    . u6 c. Y- t, F: |5 whot after millions of years. In this way, it
    * l  q! R  B' Z/ i$ Y5 }removed the last scientific objection to what( g5 ?& N* L$ D, s2 [$ B
    many geologists and paleontologists
    ! h: a% |8 s6 T% ythought was the great age of the Earth and
    - Y0 L$ E' K7 a! t! ?& ithe Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    ( G' q$ \& V/ G6 N; dhad to give up belief in the literal truth of% `% O: U7 n, w& g; i7 V7 i* j
    the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual- `: A- j3 Z+ `0 _( L4 C
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a* g- `( f% W4 I6 Y
    sequence of steps from Galileo through
    2 u& O, l* }' [( D  T, iNewton and Darwin to the present that,time) Z: Z0 m3 p+ `$ v# N% P
    after time,has weakened the hold of religious. n% ?2 @- e$ D' w: m
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays4 t: ~2 l0 |3 W$ \
    is enough to show you that this work
      l2 Z9 C9 x3 G2 J! `/ x% }is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
    ; c0 `* J3 T5 t5 [of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    7 w. q% l8 F' |1 v1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;
    ' C# M! X  h" _! u- [5 H2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;1 N# C8 Y: ^' e
    3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    ' p4 ^0 i1 L* a1 @( H. w- @  g4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-4-30 14:45

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表