设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4887|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
    9 N$ a! m8 H/ P, C. v% N! q7 u8 j- @; a3 j) S
    Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,5 ^$ n; o  i- O" Y8 p8 C9 K- G
    the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,6 s4 k8 X1 G' I* F. ^8 _
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk# H9 h1 J+ f3 W; u* C4 k8 O
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at' }5 k4 W2 ~# T7 i& Y
    McGill University in June 2003.$ V; v8 A( H' S+ \* a7 y; D* H/ ?" V. [

    2 r- m' J! ]: `; {) r' cWhen I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    6 ~$ D( f2 V1 ], L- q" mago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,* M5 c* c# w6 q  i
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How+ i: |( O6 @9 N; ~! c: c  h' X
    could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?
    ! E/ |# ^* Q$ N- w+ {' rFortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the
    6 j7 s; z6 Z  `0 X# q8 Qhands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start" B8 y% x  {- w* a
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or
    . r, Z# X! N8 a8 B) ]swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    1 I: R! x3 i9 ^  E$ {9 o' z' Othough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
    7 N+ [% g9 B- V0 rthing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    7 J) N+ C6 N  o3 B' ]8 i/ t% K; m! r9 d! ~3 c0 ^! P8 m  ?
    Another lesson to be learned, to continue1 q' Z) @; k: C$ ?8 c. T5 d" J: x
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    ; _/ d& K& [7 _+ y# k) p$ bwhile you are swimming and not sinking you. X, h4 R+ H. |1 n, Z
    should aim for rough water. When I was
    6 A6 [. P7 A! t( lteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of( m9 ], T; V7 x1 D8 s4 M9 X: X$ K
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told6 g5 y7 M& F) W5 G
    me that he wanted to go into general
    0 O$ w$ U4 R+ [relativity rather than the area I was working
    % w, Q# |- O6 u! ron, elementary particle physics, because
    / ^# ]1 j9 O- D0 D, s& Pthe principles of the former were well, \% L& I6 K+ m' i3 B3 c( v$ Q
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    , e* h4 }/ `1 e6 O( sto him. It struck me that he had just given
    - j( t: |: b% Q; r* }$ v1 O" Va perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
    % ~* E: v# b7 |8 Y* m6 NParticle physics was an area where; `0 V9 [& a5 n# ?+ n6 P
    creative work could still be done. It really was0 E* x: x- P$ q3 J2 s/ ?- z
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the4 R9 j% s- |" Y
    work of many theoretical and experimental
    - v1 e) f/ k3 }physicists has been able to sort it out, and) D, W0 {  F  N
    put everything (well, almost everything)
      W0 ^5 z' B: g, ptogether in a beautiful theory known as
    7 L0 l4 h8 x4 V5 B& Vthe standard model.My advice is to go for the
    . C& M. z$ e# K$ h" U/ }messes — that’s where the action is.
    ( X" ?+ F) c5 }3 F
    : \. O! h2 |' u. a% |My third piece of advice is probably the. ^2 Y% [9 L" E7 W7 [% `) y2 w3 e
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for
    : l/ X7 y% ~8 d2 q' i, g' cwasting time. Students are only asked to1 k% F( E, X4 y$ D# x9 Z& k
    solve problems that their professors (unless
    & G" T* v' {) o9 _& t4 qunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In
    8 |6 e: I  ^$ [0 H  v" iaddition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are5 F2 B* c4 f1 |' ^4 h
    scientifically important — they have to be
    : H! ^( b/ P( Z% A" r, s  }+ Vsolved to pass the course. But in the real& j2 J' I  s) ]9 V2 q0 C8 C
    world, it’s very hard to know which problems
    ! g3 c' s3 m" p7 E  V9 f# oare important, and you never know whether* g$ L# ]6 S2 Z5 W2 {
    at a given moment in history a problem is" V) B, X# q' M5 F, A* z7 `& \
    solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    0 _5 U( W9 U/ X0 ecentury, several leading physicists, including0 ?, l3 K, C( d6 U& o" T% D. g
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work- p# c5 u; q- w
    out a theory of the electron. This was partly
    0 r+ z" i9 Q4 Y( u, xin order to understand why all attempts to
    8 D& U  ]# X) J( ~% L0 rdetect effects of Earth’s motion through the
    2 U. z- T5 b3 }# [( a) P4 Xether had failed. We now know that, B  D' J) Y8 T( j, B& W3 b' c6 X7 }
    they were working on the wrong problem.
    : V0 J" K* d0 r, p: _7 J+ AAt that time, no one could have developed a* u; V) ]' K4 r* w6 [' t# ^
    successful theory of the electron, because
    0 N5 E) t" j2 l' t# f' k7 Zquantum mechanics had not yet been
    6 I4 S* Z9 v) m5 U7 |/ q2 ldiscovered. It took the genius of Albert
    : `; p7 R3 J" p1 L6 @5 B0 O% u( q9 x% AEinstein in 1905 to realize that the right- W. i* g/ N; f8 T0 e
    problem on which to work was the effect
    3 i( y: ^1 ]4 `! J( a9 c7 }of motion on measurements of space and
    ) {& H1 \; w/ w7 l% W- O5 d  Etime. This led him to the special theory of' x8 d( x: B) T
    relativity. As you will never be sure which
    3 P7 d9 W8 R* bare the right problems to work on, most
    8 A- s7 [- i' c$ W. Q% Iof the time that you spend in the laboratory
    1 a/ V! ~, p$ }, Zor at your desk will be wasted. If you want
    ' \6 ~: O" T) B# {! [  T: P# o+ a, Rto be creative, then you will have to get used
    & t$ r+ L4 m" |0 y1 n7 A8 H: Zto spending most of your time not being  c# M) u3 i" \  B7 A
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    . b! v  T5 e1 `3 P, pscientific knowledge.
    9 p6 f  G5 ~: I
    $ H) B1 q) u' e+ }7 u: GFinally, learn something about the history
    - a3 S1 _1 F7 e/ hof science,or at a minimum the history of your# ]9 s+ O. C/ H+ q; @
    own branch of science. The least important
    7 X' s$ w" m/ Q+ G: I+ \2 q' creason for this is that the history may actually! X5 r- \9 L! B" }- V  D
    be of some use to you in your own scientific  P* N( Y7 X3 M* W2 A: ~4 u
    work. For instance, now and then scientists2 s4 }% W7 e5 c- Y' ^) c& ~0 O
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified7 }1 \' [( a, H) f# f
    models of science that have
    , u0 O9 s% }' Fbeen proposed by philosophers from Francis$ F2 _+ b. h8 U# R
    Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.% Y+ p( s* p: ]1 g" [( y9 E& B- g
    The best antidote to the philosophy of science
    0 t/ N" Y) E7 u0 M/ D" ^is a knowledge of the history of science.  |, c! z2 l5 X8 P3 [2 |9 o1 E: S
    More importantly, the history of science
    ' w. L/ q3 {3 N  Y% K: }can make your work seem more worthwhile) U  B% W- S1 x5 {* Y7 {- i; Q
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
      `, w% L" l' H1 mgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives# M8 t: s* r: a! h. T3 o
    probably won’t understand what you’re+ f3 {# I% I" X0 U8 F# L
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    6 f, u, t& T1 g  {particle physics, you won’t even have the5 {2 K# p5 P, p2 y0 N
    satisfaction of doing something that is6 Q. p/ e8 g7 C
    immediately useful. But you can get great
    % B. Y) t$ i( T' N1 Ksatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
      E) j# x7 ]  w+ x1 uscience is a part of history.
      S1 K( K5 O3 f" J# ]' L3 V
    . t; Y* O/ l( ?5 A- C( |, ]* Y# WLook back 100 years, to 1903. How
    7 J% C2 [" ~& Ximportant is it now who was Prime Minister
    6 X3 S" Y* t3 b9 W6 Hof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    . y. C7 a$ ?+ o/ h% vUnited States? What stands out as really# R1 c: S' t. r9 {; ~
    important is that at McGill University,/ w2 x- v& z9 b5 k) q0 \
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were/ |- E( V% @8 Q3 n
    working out the nature of radioactivity.. R% X  f* `' ^' W* P
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,. f0 B8 _8 n6 i0 `( n. M
    but much more important were its
    - M' x- f% D! S, D' {' a' Gcultural implications. The understanding of% \) e( c  P2 s9 ?+ F9 _. x
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain
    8 g* m$ [/ {9 c+ k% L' Dhow the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    ! v: p  {5 t" }! y1 hhot after millions of years. In this way, it
    8 b- S- h9 W1 Iremoved the last scientific objection to what+ D( Q0 N6 p; |4 C% |, l( Z  B( j
    many geologists and paleontologists
    3 C  A5 a# V& [% B- tthought was the great age of the Earth and0 i* F( E: V& T4 m' V
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either2 l9 {) ^# _8 ^
    had to give up belief in the literal truth of/ g/ A8 W4 G0 P( x  t0 n
    the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual0 J2 Q9 }, o4 G  z4 t
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a
    ( c& f3 U* f: l6 d* H: Y( Zsequence of steps from Galileo through
      F/ B6 f8 d  F7 n! c+ x" w; R0 wNewton and Darwin to the present that,time
    1 F- A0 M0 T' ^4 [, K1 `, I1 Qafter time,has weakened the hold of religious
    & o3 S, o' O  d, a+ l5 k+ adogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays
    " _9 W1 {  p8 x+ s8 eis enough to show you that this work
    - J/ L- P0 }7 Uis not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,/ o: F; o# l2 E
    of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    9 Z( l8 [! t% a7 [1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;% r% T  A+ k+ }; k7 e
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    ) K. g$ _, f- a- a8 m3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    7 T! @# ?5 N0 e# F- h, o4 z4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-3-18 02:27

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表