设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 5095|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
      P% l  W2 G1 A+ E8 K) a6 c9 {
    ) j* {' K, a- t: E& d9 CSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    ) z6 x8 d( w4 t  x4 q* hthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,
    $ a+ V6 ]/ o+ e/ fUSA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    & q6 o+ V0 N# j% Mgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at
    / v! Q* U- g' _8 s, p! h" W$ o  P* XMcGill University in June 2003.+ _* @2 t- y. R5 K0 h1 p
    6 }9 ~# r; O$ L# H. D; z, w
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
      \( z: {) a! o+ Q0 g) A/ g: bago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
    : h; @: o0 b% z: G5 j8 uevery part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How* D- [4 M& d: Z
    could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?. U. e% j0 `, N' b' n
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the9 Q( I0 C. Z$ j* `( b4 T: O
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
    ; Q0 f$ x# `* r* i$ |6 ^doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or( O! ?. A/ k0 j% s0 q8 `( P
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —0 E: K3 f  x, c1 I- n0 D/ ]7 g; C
    though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big7 K% V8 C+ E& k% L0 ]) @; B: ?" o
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .  ~' @  p/ y9 N0 L! q+ @7 p

    6 l/ _& t% h( z. M/ e! g6 f' N7 aAnother lesson to be learned, to continue7 H0 k4 Z6 E9 y% V
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    " J8 ?/ a; S( w' \' Y2 A: {while you are swimming and not sinking you1 {- }8 ], d! _/ T% ]; C
    should aim for rough water. When I was. o" J( b4 H& z; E; B0 O( R
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of+ @! z5 n' T6 J! S. o8 m- u
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told' S# W3 s' Z% }8 `# _# t
    me that he wanted to go into general) f0 t( ^+ @; E1 p
    relativity rather than the area I was working; x9 x3 b, \8 v. ~3 w* F( e
    on, elementary particle physics, because2 }9 p" X1 S7 X
    the principles of the former were well5 M/ z: U/ \! a( |4 N, {/ m4 a
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    % r4 n- ^* T& Z) `1 yto him. It struck me that he had just given
    3 h+ _: e+ q4 I7 I$ ?& }: d, E" Ba perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
    0 K  Q4 n( Y# r  R/ }+ X5 \* AParticle physics was an area where
    $ C4 L  L& q1 _! h+ ncreative work could still be done. It really was
    + [& a* q- T6 R/ Da mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
    $ {6 Q$ V0 A5 o3 f& e1 mwork of many theoretical and experimental
    - @# j/ ^- B( O- Dphysicists has been able to sort it out, and
    1 q/ m. V+ |8 j" ?# n% R  Aput everything (well, almost everything)/ R6 x, J0 r" v, x7 U- B- q
    together in a beautiful theory known as; k4 L* t2 v: p6 l$ B6 o, @. D
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the
    4 T) i! L& w& b1 B# {messes — that’s where the action is.
    8 m5 ~: Y  v4 Z) _6 C
    9 m7 q2 k1 g2 J' d" A, h% uMy third piece of advice is probably the
    " \# |/ o- a& A6 g4 ?6 p/ ahardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for
    ' x* d* T, y" d# M6 ]& o) {: Wwasting time. Students are only asked to
    - k5 r% |9 Z! [4 V" Wsolve problems that their professors (unless' G6 V# X8 y$ J
    unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In
      d! [/ T8 z1 g" S4 l* B  aaddition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    + v3 B8 V  @. q  C; m" k. nscientifically important — they have to be
    ! I: z3 k* N" `. }+ X, A- w1 fsolved to pass the course. But in the real9 L9 d" L# q" d- f& n. D. \; I
    world, it’s very hard to know which problems/ I/ V4 g2 C: e2 A! k& M
    are important, and you never know whether
    2 D; J/ ~9 X5 I4 J& D0 Gat a given moment in history a problem is
    6 O% r# I& m8 w  ^) ?/ hsolvable. At the beginning of the twentieth, \( Z% K2 ^3 g+ X4 n& o) x
    century, several leading physicists, including1 N( `2 }2 S3 ?1 Q. k! w
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    " I" Z% ?8 N. @( V6 d, {7 Iout a theory of the electron. This was partly: Z, l! F7 v4 n; M' C- a, _+ g2 v; `
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    2 r; _0 x! w) G7 f7 [( A2 mdetect effects of Earth’s motion through the% M6 x3 @3 `# X* P0 f
    ether had failed. We now know that
    4 y, ^; P% V1 R/ c7 z! W1 w: Cthey were working on the wrong problem.3 ], W8 K* X- Z+ L4 x- H! Y
    At that time, no one could have developed a& t; {6 Y3 \; m4 L# e& z
    successful theory of the electron, because
    ! u) z1 j' p( O; W! m  Jquantum mechanics had not yet been1 e3 v/ |1 Y' j
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert5 _/ a6 L+ O  l3 y5 G0 [
    Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right
    / K0 \' ]) G) ]4 Q0 f5 `problem on which to work was the effect
    ! Z: k& n$ B+ d1 k) x: ^+ uof motion on measurements of space and
    & I" W0 d+ m* B# g+ r1 S- Rtime. This led him to the special theory of) t% t0 t) P. I4 s# R3 n9 b7 w
    relativity. As you will never be sure which
    3 i. |3 P- d# m* M: qare the right problems to work on, most
    ' \- [* h! d7 t8 Y& Cof the time that you spend in the laboratory
    : u0 d: p, g! O7 F9 y. ?7 Eor at your desk will be wasted. If you want; m$ p* H( v/ P1 f& l
    to be creative, then you will have to get used
    5 t. ?( Q1 v* A2 [% J4 _to spending most of your time not being& m: U* l6 ~% m- y/ x1 M' Y( o$ o! T
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    $ I" l' H9 Y$ n+ b: f) Nscientific knowledge.
    , c3 K# u- I  r: L% ]3 u; g% f! y5 K  c) }. ]3 o, K/ F
    Finally, learn something about the history9 ~/ g1 L! c3 @$ H$ k
    of science,or at a minimum the history of your
    & U7 }, _2 p$ X$ A0 C: Zown branch of science. The least important
      o5 ^+ o1 s" areason for this is that the history may actually% F" p& t; Q& L3 [* b' g. f
    be of some use to you in your own scientific# f1 x4 V( K- `, Y- f; L
    work. For instance, now and then scientists; d9 @# T0 |$ p4 M
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified( g1 q+ k4 ^  _! U$ d/ k
    models of science that have, ~9 E9 u5 |% T/ \6 E$ |
    been proposed by philosophers from Francis
    ( X0 |4 F5 R  D4 rBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    0 g! M' k1 p& f' E6 l# IThe best antidote to the philosophy of science0 K9 M5 w- w" L/ }6 e' r8 s& y
    is a knowledge of the history of science.' G  c. x  i3 I
    More importantly, the history of science
    4 X3 S% v4 S" C$ {3 a. z! ?can make your work seem more worthwhile
    1 @0 \3 U3 f. h) B: j8 C& jto you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    6 ^8 o" u- q, J/ e6 fgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives
    * x1 ^/ B+ `5 a/ rprobably won’t understand what you’re4 n$ ?) D% u8 M- `7 O
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    ' ~1 ^" W8 i  i3 V* @particle physics, you won’t even have the
    & |- |$ H/ J4 o: v( K1 ?3 l0 {! tsatisfaction of doing something that is
    1 H  ?0 [8 r; v' rimmediately useful. But you can get great
    & V- |& m! h6 Q; S7 ^( Jsatisfaction by recognizing that your work in! Y0 s2 P" o6 F9 ~  z
    science is a part of history.3 B3 f/ K9 d3 P; q  \
    5 e: H# ~" r/ a) d5 x
    Look back 100 years, to 1903. How( f: a( D. O/ u( R
    important is it now who was Prime Minister# a: R& c- W2 J- ?) d  o2 ^1 }1 ^
    of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    1 \) Y! b+ z$ A% Y+ G1 ~United States? What stands out as really9 s; v% `  G5 g
    important is that at McGill University,# T, p- c% l8 r; Z" [& L$ P0 Z$ d7 Z) F
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were1 ~+ z4 ]9 c8 W6 Z% L! W
    working out the nature of radioactivity.! ^0 {" `4 @- I5 _
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,. C$ N' m  ?, Z
    but much more important were its
    3 ~2 T1 ^! D5 {) {- U+ ^  h7 }2 zcultural implications. The understanding of
    5 O: O) e( V8 ~, M* n" J6 l0 R/ v/ Z+ }2 Xradioactivity allowed physicists to explain" C3 q; u. U8 v/ a" X
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    * L6 v# D; j, G# ghot after millions of years. In this way, it
    / g3 u- r) P4 J/ m8 C: l" mremoved the last scientific objection to what
    $ O$ T0 v+ Q/ S+ H7 g& q  Hmany geologists and paleontologists8 s3 j/ j) o$ t6 P8 c
    thought was the great age of the Earth and% U; o+ l' V7 Q- D( u3 L7 O, h
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    ) _  Y3 R5 O0 f8 q9 p# k. nhad to give up belief in the literal truth of
    9 Q5 D' G: z& O& H) I6 T( K7 E# jthe Bible or resign themselves to intellectual
    5 ~; m7 ^' S, v7 h% N8 Qirrelevance. This was just one step in a" d5 `0 `3 t1 j
    sequence of steps from Galileo through
    - @" |. M7 l3 _2 ~( ANewton and Darwin to the present that,time
    9 K5 R# D: q5 B  r$ `after time,has weakened the hold of religious9 _- R. `- j# p/ [% T2 X7 e/ q8 d
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays1 D) x0 U. L3 ~2 D7 A& K8 x
    is enough to show you that this work' @" ?( `2 J' W7 N. r+ y- c# q/ T& g- ~
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
      \- S# r) B/ S' n$ ~of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊4 |) s' [. ?% O, i9 ^& N8 m5 s( P
    1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;
    2 b+ ?9 n5 K8 c# _1 T6 r; e; V2 v6 M" w2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;8 G1 f7 {9 R3 E
    3.“浪费时间”是必要的;& c: Q- n2 s( d+ q2 G  x( {! o+ O- D1 _% P
    4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-10-18 00:38

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表