|
马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入
×
Steven Weinberg' X8 h3 F4 j" n" N2 g2 U8 [
. ~+ u8 r' U8 G$ S
Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,8 C- M& _( c$ \) s1 ^" e. c$ @
the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,
6 K; V3 N( R: P5 t: M. u9 J% CUSA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
! V- m- m- A! k) f I: Y' J$ Lgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at8 N0 F3 n4 ? z B7 p" h8 S8 ?. G/ t, q
McGill University in June 2003.
+ Y( X- L% D5 t3 j. g9 D& d
+ k: J# n2 Q) q5 |5 |0 a8 BWhen I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
6 L' G6 w, y- Z: P% k& ]3 T: K |6 ]ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
7 q* I4 Z0 R" F3 T, k; s, wevery part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How8 d" J/ I& ?5 ]2 p# E$ f% S; o
could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?" z: {( A' c& [ Y( ]
Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the
. _) P- ^( Y9 v9 C# Xhands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
9 v3 }& @* b5 y3 o( k. B% rdoing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or+ ~3 S# j! N2 }8 b7 @' O
swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —3 w$ D! h" o! v3 s6 s$ ]5 _
though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
: s' |8 F6 t. T5 T4 hthing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
" p a' \+ G6 w0 z, C" F' K. b9 J( X) _' x- [
Another lesson to be learned, to continue
7 d. u" V3 R+ o' l2 g3 D4 Tusing my oceanographic metaphor, is that
`; P* p5 g4 ?/ u0 Z2 j2 l2 K; cwhile you are swimming and not sinking you
: u5 F" f1 X4 i3 R% Ishould aim for rough water. When I was
* q }# M# U: c& R$ a! T- hteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of. Q9 o# R ]5 M7 N
Technology in the late 1960s, a student told
- g7 F; j. ]2 I; v/ H9 h3 ?3 E" ~me that he wanted to go into general! ]* x. p! n8 F) q& [% _" n
relativity rather than the area I was working
( y5 ]. k1 f" G; `. _( \- Won, elementary particle physics, because
L7 V3 R, `+ h1 T& l* n, g5 d0 mthe principles of the former were well) Z8 Q; O9 H# ^4 f
known, while the latter seemed like a mess
, B. m! S" c$ F8 Gto him. It struck me that he had just given
+ o1 o& t' R; Ka perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
. x7 @ ^* i, K* PParticle physics was an area where
* j" {, X! {" acreative work could still be done. It really was+ g/ }! k3 {0 F4 D, Q& N! [
a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
6 h# e$ v! F! n# nwork of many theoretical and experimental
+ x- a! C. C# J; y% g: U, F7 w$ Ephysicists has been able to sort it out, and5 F: g1 s* X8 `7 a. W
put everything (well, almost everything)! j4 D1 e. b0 [
together in a beautiful theory known as
1 \ O, p0 P0 K" gthe standard model.My advice is to go for the* E+ B0 W, g; K) \& m8 G
messes — that’s where the action is.
/ z$ Y, g# b% E$ I/ e; [* N1 k& T0 p1 f" S; U5 k$ E7 s% C" l0 P. D, N( F
My third piece of advice is probably the
: D9 }/ n' }/ whardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for' B5 T" E1 ?; p4 v
wasting time. Students are only asked to* O: d+ r0 o! L7 Y3 V
solve problems that their professors (unless
8 T6 J9 A& i& S6 |unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In# F( K5 F2 U" Z2 ?" ^
addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
* R( s$ [1 |6 tscientifically important — they have to be
3 Y; q w6 d. J3 osolved to pass the course. But in the real2 _7 h( ?) w7 v8 V8 S. v
world, it’s very hard to know which problems6 M3 J; K: t" z. l" w, z
are important, and you never know whether" V+ k9 ?6 d7 L; y: v2 c, s
at a given moment in history a problem is, x5 R+ j- _5 a6 b4 W' j
solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth: Z- h& \* ~2 Y
century, several leading physicists, including; t' n! }9 I7 A5 `
Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work; a: J: ~- _7 e) Q r Z6 o
out a theory of the electron. This was partly
{6 s5 [2 w8 r, t5 X2 Uin order to understand why all attempts to
( r" n" F# l' f0 ndetect effects of Earth’s motion through the% @+ C& W# ~% K. ?+ }
ether had failed. We now know that
' ?8 C: H4 ~; Athey were working on the wrong problem.; b3 ~' v g$ e4 I
At that time, no one could have developed a
0 z! n( s' s7 k. i3 Asuccessful theory of the electron, because- f" e% m& B- W1 }( Z
quantum mechanics had not yet been
1 f; f1 v% B( e8 mdiscovered. It took the genius of Albert$ d( a' P- U5 H
Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right
' I$ ~8 V3 b# }9 Nproblem on which to work was the effect
0 l+ r; \0 Y( j" f4 i4 i& v2 f* Jof motion on measurements of space and4 F& F' }' ?! Q1 G- u' A L
time. This led him to the special theory of
5 t5 E6 p- @! mrelativity. As you will never be sure which1 h: o M5 n: D& y; _# h/ h
are the right problems to work on, most
, Y. d- ]& s) ]7 l6 }$ W# ]of the time that you spend in the laboratory7 V) y3 |, _- Z
or at your desk will be wasted. If you want, [2 I, t* B5 t8 f/ p, U
to be creative, then you will have to get used K. \4 a: @( t: t z' a6 W2 b% B
to spending most of your time not being# f# F6 e5 U( F2 V% b5 t
creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of6 Q+ z& q4 v- p! T& v1 U
scientific knowledge.; T+ i4 u- }" p! Z* F
+ Q, H; [0 _2 z4 ]% l3 P: u
Finally, learn something about the history
7 i& I& H2 L# m5 Q" S' H2 l; eof science,or at a minimum the history of your
( i- L* |, j3 ?3 h' Oown branch of science. The least important
7 F! H2 e) e) y, Z& q% Freason for this is that the history may actually
) _; G4 i. B' Y) E- ~# x5 Qbe of some use to you in your own scientific
6 h& M3 A9 f& \" r( b. }1 `7 t! |work. For instance, now and then scientists, y3 R/ n9 v/ Q! x: ^3 @
are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified2 D r- f' }0 x" P5 j
models of science that have
! o2 E( _6 V- `) U% l* m: s0 fbeen proposed by philosophers from Francis
$ z1 Y2 @# g8 T! p& Q3 hBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
. x8 ]( ]+ \; f! k2 i7 q3 h# e. i% S8 m+ bThe best antidote to the philosophy of science ^* j( y9 t/ @6 B8 v# S
is a knowledge of the history of science.
; L' G$ E& a4 b8 c+ yMore importantly, the history of science5 h, @* E8 b l6 p( f% H2 o! x
can make your work seem more worthwhile+ G7 U8 N. s$ k/ u: O9 o% Y
to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not7 A2 X0 C; l9 Z+ n$ F+ d( k% q
going to get rich. Your friends and relatives
5 }4 L4 ]9 t" S) jprobably won’t understand what you’re# q$ k9 x* x/ l! V9 U/ I1 W
doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
+ G1 `9 A/ Q( V! c+ e+ qparticle physics, you won’t even have the2 W; o) N, z, n! {, ?
satisfaction of doing something that is
# S. s& d G' I0 \# C8 c! P" h0 vimmediately useful. But you can get great
& U( V% s/ u( s: k% W+ {3 p8 ]/ l3 Psatisfaction by recognizing that your work in* w. I8 H; U% P0 ]' Y
science is a part of history.
/ y. G# D$ ~; f! s# p
. m2 ]$ R7 N2 A0 I# SLook back 100 years, to 1903. How6 r' w3 h. `* _! ~
important is it now who was Prime Minister
& S9 t3 h! G# ]6 g5 f' _7 A: nof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
, g! ] R' p0 j+ p. E3 S1 o* O* ~United States? What stands out as really6 @5 U" G( h- l- k
important is that at McGill University,
: x% D' i+ r7 U9 l, P4 o0 p5 bErnest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were
. _& {! L$ x. |4 Qworking out the nature of radioactivity.
( N% O5 i6 M. ]! T% RThis work (of course!) had practical applications,4 C E3 n6 x' ]; j [5 o: ^) V
but much more important were its9 f% _+ h7 R) A0 |1 t; I
cultural implications. The understanding of5 A: w$ G; L7 y: [9 g3 R
radioactivity allowed physicists to explain" X- k* n* _& l+ }
how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
5 Q5 L+ Z2 c" ehot after millions of years. In this way, it
0 g3 j% d0 @; }. i5 S7 eremoved the last scientific objection to what7 Q. O8 H6 S% g" t
many geologists and paleontologists
) N8 L! L( J! K0 s, d$ u: v! O: ~thought was the great age of the Earth and
3 C0 ]' _' A. v2 |$ d% c( Gthe Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either+ S8 ~& \) W3 b/ C, U
had to give up belief in the literal truth of" A& d$ l2 M9 L
the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual; o: _% L2 S3 i5 Q& B, P
irrelevance. This was just one step in a0 C& C9 [4 S3 W$ x/ H) Z
sequence of steps from Galileo through- _8 o# O# J. f. M
Newton and Darwin to the present that,time
( @0 W K. q; t; H pafter time,has weakened the hold of religious
# i7 T* W' T. r) \dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays0 Z1 }0 D1 C7 E
is enough to show you that this work
9 I K. j ?0 x7 {, F% a7 |is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
8 K7 N& d/ n5 C. E, [1 ?of which scientists are able to feel proud. |