设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 5098|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg/ A6 l' n6 i$ k2 P! p0 P; N5 k- ?
    7 V" I+ l; h; ?. `7 Q
    Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    5 c( x( q% j: Z4 S/ Rthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,  u) {$ s) C5 X' s: Q
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    ; h9 {, R1 J9 O( R+ o6 W3 x5 Pgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at, L5 H9 k8 {( `! o6 n$ o
    McGill University in June 2003.& o) P+ {/ L* d
    - a' z0 a8 E. D4 S  q
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    , Y. p0 u( C) N: Bago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
    9 J! C$ ^2 R) m, ^1 yevery part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    & t1 z. y$ t9 c6 Dcould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?+ B: J- p' y& s* Q
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the, k% ^& K! Z' a5 X3 D
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start- V. p3 J" n2 x. Z
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or0 S  c  S) s) i( s* e
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    4 i5 L  h8 i0 F3 q9 l# C4 cthough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
    ' O1 u, k  P& E. v* g7 `thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    / d& K/ ^/ n: a! t1 m. A& q3 ^3 Q
    9 e" C. q! }9 @1 Y8 y3 ?- MAnother lesson to be learned, to continue6 V9 Z9 j  @* @8 ]
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    * z& \- H; T# L5 s! p1 Z/ h& owhile you are swimming and not sinking you
    ' i  l. w$ U8 ~- ]$ `( C, |should aim for rough water. When I was
    7 M7 T# I# j4 ]1 ?; e4 cteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of! R  |' c) `0 o: u+ G8 B5 T8 m
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told
    ( I" M1 r+ b5 U9 ~+ a' M& D4 j( n! Lme that he wanted to go into general
    7 A$ _8 Q9 Z) Prelativity rather than the area I was working8 K$ q" a# ?, v& N8 i1 K1 ?
    on, elementary particle physics, because
    & b+ W8 y) E' F) ^the principles of the former were well# J/ f0 _( `, x1 i4 f) L
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    / m( ~% x7 V6 U  t# s; y' @1 C) Mto him. It struck me that he had just given4 j1 d" H* W9 q( D' d6 F3 f+ R/ D
    a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.4 q; q5 i1 I, j' c
    Particle physics was an area where
    " V  w: K  Z- G1 |+ C9 v3 Z# zcreative work could still be done. It really was
    / O& S+ U- Y6 {a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the6 `, {2 Q6 k2 h3 c
    work of many theoretical and experimental( n% m7 [, ^1 F
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and
    8 d) m4 s" e3 S- {# Iput everything (well, almost everything)
    ) q; p: N# e% J8 \3 ttogether in a beautiful theory known as. N% z' @, t1 q1 h5 l
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the
    ) c% F- ~0 `1 O2 F0 u  ~0 J% Hmesses — that’s where the action is." \; }" Z( q) d3 m+ W+ p

    2 C$ P4 l+ {/ B+ ?My third piece of advice is probably the' N4 @9 w" G) D, h7 `7 K
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for
    + Q: q, Z8 B: Z* o1 O) D& Lwasting time. Students are only asked to
    # [6 [1 V$ W+ B( ~3 d" \# _8 t8 Dsolve problems that their professors (unless
    ; O8 F+ g: ^3 [7 s5 Wunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In' A$ n: ?2 U# i& x* l
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    2 s* @5 ^1 e- Q9 D5 m' x4 Y; V0 dscientifically important — they have to be
    $ ~$ m7 X4 c; O, n3 msolved to pass the course. But in the real
    & M& Y& Z8 x  T& Aworld, it’s very hard to know which problems
    - P6 N; K" Z# M9 w8 Qare important, and you never know whether
    ) Z& M) n2 M2 iat a given moment in history a problem is/ M" u4 a. X9 B1 D! d8 @7 L) H
    solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    / j: o; n; q: `0 G& |century, several leading physicists, including5 x4 i6 }! X8 F
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    + U( Y0 N  u/ I3 d: `3 Z; g) Mout a theory of the electron. This was partly# T4 E" A( n; U3 m! ?
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    9 z. j" y' o2 ~' ~detect effects of Earth’s motion through the4 c) b- Q: Z7 `; p
    ether had failed. We now know that& N8 B$ H6 Z% X+ b) y% M% f" h
    they were working on the wrong problem.
      R9 S- y! H; w9 ]2 N/ c" `At that time, no one could have developed a* b# Z; g. h) \1 u5 A4 g: H% h+ J
    successful theory of the electron, because$ j& r: E- y1 U" g2 D. h1 B# C
    quantum mechanics had not yet been( O. r! X% c* i0 g
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert
    . _  G6 s  t6 f. J, e: NEinstein in 1905 to realize that the right) v7 o- v* T% n# Z
    problem on which to work was the effect" p. v& C2 X* W
    of motion on measurements of space and% z; u# [+ c7 D+ Q  W
    time. This led him to the special theory of
    & A+ Z2 u: f, g9 s& S( C% I# s- Vrelativity. As you will never be sure which9 d9 S( L" ~! `9 L: A
    are the right problems to work on, most
    8 ~  g, v  d" H, [- w# Cof the time that you spend in the laboratory! |* o8 A! H8 Q; u
    or at your desk will be wasted. If you want+ D8 p5 t1 G( g3 F7 H- L9 r, C" V# g
    to be creative, then you will have to get used5 C' }+ v% y6 d1 r; `( {
    to spending most of your time not being, a' ~0 t9 ?0 g2 q$ m
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
      V7 H( n0 c" k. \, U( ]scientific knowledge.
    2 Z5 b' z* i( H; @7 D" D0 q  ?1 h: c6 a* F6 \  M
    Finally, learn something about the history
    9 v3 t3 \" y6 l! zof science,or at a minimum the history of your
    - L% i' @' k% P: ?/ T- Mown branch of science. The least important
    ( w% x9 Q: f/ p' X; K: M/ oreason for this is that the history may actually' p4 E% c- |9 Y: O
    be of some use to you in your own scientific
    . C, r% N9 @1 U2 E3 E5 ^work. For instance, now and then scientists, R! \' R3 r* n1 Z
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    , p) p" f- Y; ?. I9 Ymodels of science that have
    ! c# ?+ j7 k- B; ?been proposed by philosophers from Francis! Q0 z3 h9 ?: G2 a+ R  W6 ?
    Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    ' r8 Q3 C: i3 i% \. n3 ]9 pThe best antidote to the philosophy of science
      q( e+ t4 J5 U$ `6 H/ ]% r$ g& Uis a knowledge of the history of science.  w1 }; a8 F: t7 O* _: j
    More importantly, the history of science
    4 b/ S/ B% t; Lcan make your work seem more worthwhile
    2 ?+ ~6 O, S! V1 q% `+ `to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    1 S" {% A- k  A) i& `- {1 S% vgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives
    2 B" W+ x; C3 E  oprobably won’t understand what you’re! s  q( K2 L: [& ?
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    : g& a8 c7 V' }6 Y* R0 ?0 dparticle physics, you won’t even have the
    9 P0 Q) |; w& g7 R  l. B+ \: P: osatisfaction of doing something that is- h6 }& |7 |8 ~) s, }
    immediately useful. But you can get great
      p+ L4 r- q  Psatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    " [* n# T* i+ o$ Vscience is a part of history./ y* G; Q4 P% F; {

    1 J$ P8 A0 p9 z$ u9 gLook back 100 years, to 1903. How! W9 h0 j8 u5 H3 t
    important is it now who was Prime Minister
    ( H! \9 M5 u, x- ?) Jof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the! U5 k+ U1 O( l; A: h9 |
    United States? What stands out as really
    1 P/ V$ B% J$ q5 |important is that at McGill University,* F4 _+ F9 m# r0 r
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were4 P$ d) e: G0 x
    working out the nature of radioactivity.
    ' ]! u$ p) X8 j* w  X+ aThis work (of course!) had practical applications,2 z( n3 V& W$ u% C! y. r  L  O9 r# D
    but much more important were its
    ) d  q* ^9 p5 _* O0 V; y# hcultural implications. The understanding of/ R. U$ c* V/ D6 @/ R( o9 _7 t# m0 |
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain
    , i% r4 R: k/ a* U. \9 Fhow the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    , k6 h- s/ \  ?hot after millions of years. In this way, it
    / D! N, }% ?9 t: Z  }+ Xremoved the last scientific objection to what7 |2 ^/ {5 Y" r: D& ~" S
    many geologists and paleontologists1 X% s' s5 p" s6 g% W# J
    thought was the great age of the Earth and% V9 E$ v" _6 ~% ]
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    9 M* n7 L% B8 b( v& S# H6 ]had to give up belief in the literal truth of
      B7 h6 s+ e! j: F% n5 \2 H- Vthe Bible or resign themselves to intellectual5 I# R8 W. n9 b1 s1 y( v* g
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a
    % w4 @; a8 ?! \9 [" \. g8 G8 I) Y/ [; Gsequence of steps from Galileo through
    6 Z, q$ ~# h$ k/ Q. U8 ^Newton and Darwin to the present that,time3 E4 ~# e5 n1 O( _9 O& G$ i
    after time,has weakened the hold of religious
      v8 M, m6 C/ y$ x8 xdogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays9 T/ w& {6 ?  M4 Q8 p
    is enough to show you that this work, l" h8 L7 o$ t8 v
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
    6 q+ b: h4 y3 Q: u6 c/ _' N9 lof which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊9 m# w9 Z9 S  I3 e! u0 b
    1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;
    + T+ `) J  R& m, c" b$ [2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    4 _# {! s! g3 p* `! d3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    & A& h3 _4 h- |4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-10-18 01:34

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表