设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4886|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg  c& s; L7 L3 Z. |2 Q) D& C9 O
    ; L) R) X. S$ k! R( d
    Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    1 V$ d' @) t6 d' ithe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,! j/ t( ?. a: R: A
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk$ ^- u1 ^- q1 @1 ?7 j# O
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at; T! M1 h2 }6 r& R6 ~8 Q
    McGill University in June 2003.
    ' V$ D& u0 g9 Q# d: F
    2 e* S9 l; k! m8 \: Q" V  u: _8 RWhen I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    ! T6 Q5 c3 n3 ^  y5 N. A. z/ {ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
    , `' |3 G/ I# Qevery part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    . w, ~- I. K% Ucould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?0 s: i' V$ x4 t. K0 l8 ]7 {3 ]5 {$ k
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the' {( Z% e) b3 T! f% Q
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
    & f2 I) I$ ~$ ldoing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or
    ! [( o9 L/ F5 r" u( _swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    & S* o1 I# v! X% ethough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
    . l; v6 o- J2 I0 k2 \7 k# d1 _7 Sthing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    # H. _+ e: U) _
    ! g% J5 f8 L* B* H- B2 rAnother lesson to be learned, to continue# l) K; j9 M8 g- p0 b) ]2 b
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that  G( d" i$ [2 h5 z8 U! h- [
    while you are swimming and not sinking you
    7 l3 z9 ^  m9 ~7 {8 C% X5 Qshould aim for rough water. When I was% @5 q5 M% ?1 @9 z; [
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of8 u, `- ?9 q3 t
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told
      \- s- }) B2 l/ Q3 A5 Kme that he wanted to go into general
    9 q& x  C2 \9 p' _# Qrelativity rather than the area I was working
    / m3 v, X! e3 F+ f- Pon, elementary particle physics, because
    1 x2 J2 ]& `# V$ e" Athe principles of the former were well
    . X! D- E  D7 rknown, while the latter seemed like a mess
    % {% Z& l0 x/ v' t  `- pto him. It struck me that he had just given
    & L1 K- E. s7 `# O% G. ~! ?a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.- v- Z$ {+ V; O. ^1 z3 y% u+ Z, M
    Particle physics was an area where
    % u2 p) a' y* @3 [( P$ Bcreative work could still be done. It really was/ M2 i- ?* F# ?  r
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
    ' [% G% s" h- ?( x8 ?$ \3 V8 Vwork of many theoretical and experimental3 @" R6 b7 o' k: a/ E3 [2 Q
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and
    0 \9 ]& E' \3 w' @9 e, cput everything (well, almost everything)
    & N+ O/ n! y2 G3 w& Gtogether in a beautiful theory known as
    - g5 p1 x7 r. Q, {% R; Tthe standard model.My advice is to go for the9 q$ _( ?' I3 X7 P
    messes — that’s where the action is.6 [  v- E( w0 E1 ~$ l- T! J+ t

    + a" `  I4 I* L; |$ ]My third piece of advice is probably the! E+ I, a& Z* m; Y" k; O
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for3 S5 U+ S/ ^- }2 Y& P, z
    wasting time. Students are only asked to# B& D; P; c- X$ m4 Y2 T' c& V
    solve problems that their professors (unless
    ' z. f5 a2 |! `0 `) X) Lunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In! P- ]: u' w: W2 d
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are) [) Z9 c6 I" P7 l- k9 }
    scientifically important — they have to be! e( B) j7 N* u) n
    solved to pass the course. But in the real
    " d* D# G# s1 c% K/ Z5 u, ~1 N% v7 a) ~8 eworld, it’s very hard to know which problems- Z. G* i$ q0 f
    are important, and you never know whether
    3 T+ w/ {1 z, C) a/ ~" f1 O# R# j. [at a given moment in history a problem is$ e8 H$ y9 k/ M% o: u3 z2 x
    solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth; @/ \! d9 x" X4 }. w
    century, several leading physicists, including% z' m; V8 G5 A5 \# o% `) u
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work. B8 v% T1 u5 I" p! o2 V
    out a theory of the electron. This was partly1 ?$ t; j% R1 e! s& ]1 X& `9 ~2 Z5 l
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    . E4 u5 A  m2 Ydetect effects of Earth’s motion through the
    - _, m- |7 r$ W, U& F! Qether had failed. We now know that6 r. U, g9 i: d. G2 z" s: D
    they were working on the wrong problem.3 n& O$ M% K$ C: H
    At that time, no one could have developed a3 E# o0 P* h- b' Q
    successful theory of the electron, because# u! X; p( t. ~1 J! d# v: a
    quantum mechanics had not yet been
    & p# r& g) D  l* |# A' Bdiscovered. It took the genius of Albert+ ~5 ~9 F4 g) N* z
    Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right/ M- F( z3 j+ j
    problem on which to work was the effect
    ; \- [2 T2 a: e( sof motion on measurements of space and- {' s: m7 f/ U0 y0 @, z5 l
    time. This led him to the special theory of
    1 b/ Y, ?( b; J: B, M. Q; Erelativity. As you will never be sure which
    ; P. f9 j7 o7 [; w  Jare the right problems to work on, most) G0 r$ A- D" {1 P( Q+ A
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory
    9 I7 ^/ @. ^( a0 |# [or at your desk will be wasted. If you want4 v/ B( j& b- J4 o# E
    to be creative, then you will have to get used3 q4 g9 o- f0 M! b7 i! h) F8 D
    to spending most of your time not being
    * D9 H8 [( Z) ucreative, to being becalmed on the ocean of! V+ Q' Q; g/ b* b9 {. S" j: X' u
    scientific knowledge.4 Z  h! y7 X" h8 |7 V. u: x

    / _& ^+ ?6 e; E* B9 MFinally, learn something about the history* @$ w% M/ {6 |9 S
    of science,or at a minimum the history of your+ P, p7 J0 n6 K
    own branch of science. The least important
      C1 O4 {6 t3 w. I( _* o6 {reason for this is that the history may actually  E) M. G6 |+ F2 L# C
    be of some use to you in your own scientific
    8 r' u7 |. D! I: {# U; g. zwork. For instance, now and then scientists
    3 T' ^/ l1 a' J4 a; q: O: l6 _. B2 w' Oare hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    - G) _; g6 V* T( }7 }" omodels of science that have
    ! _. f& i  `/ R: F: b9 K0 e3 c7 |% ]3 Gbeen proposed by philosophers from Francis& p& R4 n! n. y! _- b, Y4 u+ B
    Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    7 }8 E2 o" O/ P# ^The best antidote to the philosophy of science+ p5 j4 \4 l8 `( g5 n
    is a knowledge of the history of science.& K) o8 u2 O0 D. t9 f* u
    More importantly, the history of science; c  f. X$ e1 E( ]5 v. L( S
    can make your work seem more worthwhile
    2 _- [4 Y# o( F) zto you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    7 J5 q9 I  j8 K, U1 Cgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives
    ( ~. s2 }- |" R/ q0 C/ `' i, Z; \probably won’t understand what you’re# ^/ `) `( @0 A( s$ y( q- b
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    4 B: C( t" H$ r6 mparticle physics, you won’t even have the
    8 ^5 N0 s' I% c+ `; K4 ?5 c# Isatisfaction of doing something that is
    / B" z: N* q/ R( i4 ]4 U2 himmediately useful. But you can get great
    + y7 K% g6 g( u  S1 r7 g/ nsatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    3 g+ L' q+ J3 J: `5 ?science is a part of history.
    $ M; d+ B5 V2 }5 A7 C2 z9 v2 @0 d7 f2 F6 m! `! B! u
    Look back 100 years, to 1903. How
    ! R4 j; f! Q# L& ~; Yimportant is it now who was Prime Minister
    ) n* s4 Z+ s" C3 ?) Eof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    3 H; |) a1 _0 E; xUnited States? What stands out as really" U# I1 x5 ~- K; g# u
    important is that at McGill University,
      ~7 d7 s5 d6 K, B$ g+ aErnest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were. C2 }7 h! ^: F
    working out the nature of radioactivity." J9 {: m  X; f
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,  g) l# _$ e  Z% s( n4 o9 @1 {7 y( K9 ^
    but much more important were its
    ) w+ d; @- }+ m( _8 Gcultural implications. The understanding of" i* p  `, |8 o7 A4 ~9 G* c* z
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain
    5 f' E* ^( ]5 A! J: Xhow the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be9 A% l- X% u4 F/ x* @+ V
    hot after millions of years. In this way, it
      @0 [" U/ p* i6 Oremoved the last scientific objection to what
    ) u  g" T% B% qmany geologists and paleontologists
    - w1 P3 U+ u' z& I! ythought was the great age of the Earth and
    ' Z' P7 E5 N6 _4 @3 A$ ?the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either( B0 N0 |2 r& W1 x1 |
    had to give up belief in the literal truth of
    9 I. X) I$ o( h( |4 @( h# @the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual
    ' O/ c- s! M9 ?% Mirrelevance. This was just one step in a3 Y9 E$ l& P$ u. ?2 s
    sequence of steps from Galileo through
    4 w- {4 r( @# m0 HNewton and Darwin to the present that,time/ e' M$ s( k! I% s
    after time,has weakened the hold of religious; F! i% c, E% W8 T
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays5 Y) O9 t) E  a0 e2 _
    is enough to show you that this work  N4 A+ v4 u$ H0 B
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
    ; K  F6 R& c( Oof which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    1 K9 I; I3 S: g7 v  {9 D8 |: N& d1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;) D" C6 Q% t0 U2 c5 o- ~/ k- D
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;3 N1 f3 h8 P$ S4 y$ c* V
    3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    ' C* k$ U" c, S: d4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-3-18 01:26

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表