设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4384|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
    9 z' @$ Z1 X6 T8 O8 E0 C' ^$ N
    ) i+ R, V6 |9 A: U/ W# F& _* lSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    $ u) X! s; f$ X- D8 [2 hthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,
    ( S) S0 y% Q6 c; ?) HUSA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    ( C8 n6 S% l# i& I# Fgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at( H4 f+ y' z( K% D2 U. ?
    McGill University in June 2003.
    ; j; f8 o. {" B* c+ @. k* @+ H& Z$ E8 A
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years' @& p" I- @: F/ q
    ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
    , J; m; l' v9 cevery part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    5 ^3 |* V! C9 K% Kcould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?
    ; c& J" d$ j. a6 I$ sFortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the
    ! g# t" ?9 M( _7 D7 L) Fhands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
    / z9 j( |' d& a0 A# L* U4 g7 J  [doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or8 |3 ^7 m3 n2 I) p
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    4 L7 M# ]/ @7 K  U& z$ Rthough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
    5 c1 P' |- c* d- c/ w, Athing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    " E( J. Z0 T( m
    8 V* c! V* X/ q* f: D9 ^Another lesson to be learned, to continue( Q: g8 l* H$ e$ Y
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    + w+ w2 J( @" M; F1 W, a# n3 Lwhile you are swimming and not sinking you+ W9 s) @% f" t" Z/ _9 L( @
    should aim for rough water. When I was
    9 @1 v* w6 ]4 M! `$ U( c( U. S& lteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of
    ; j* T& B; {$ s% l% z* mTechnology in the late 1960s, a student told2 }# T7 J' {+ a
    me that he wanted to go into general
    ( G' Y# t- o7 f3 qrelativity rather than the area I was working9 L% k. H  w9 o: Q: g( i3 g
    on, elementary particle physics, because
    $ j* ^- q; C7 M$ z. n3 W" G$ I7 Vthe principles of the former were well: H) M9 k" i+ m& _" {
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    ( D8 F3 d% c/ |3 }& j) Sto him. It struck me that he had just given
    ) ]' o0 a9 P3 _# v- G  Da perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
    ; Y- W7 H2 t! W% Y" D- b5 ]. r3 p9 d2 VParticle physics was an area where
    2 Y' b3 L5 K# icreative work could still be done. It really was: ^9 D, x- `7 q
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
    " R8 w8 ]; w) t0 U+ Z0 f( lwork of many theoretical and experimental9 {+ J3 ?# G* F4 O0 [
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and
    ) U  y; P3 p+ W4 ?8 }: d1 X6 }2 Dput everything (well, almost everything)3 D+ N8 u1 z6 g: l& U4 s! v" a% f
    together in a beautiful theory known as" B- W  D( L- @' M
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the: w& z  ?6 ]6 P- j/ V
    messes — that’s where the action is.
    7 _; y  D( d( y
    ; Q2 h+ \% }5 jMy third piece of advice is probably the
    ! S$ r' }6 q, Ihardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for+ U; K0 u7 q% ?+ E5 B) D
    wasting time. Students are only asked to
    . u# A0 Y: `5 [solve problems that their professors (unless
    ; [+ }. c& X9 P/ gunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In
    9 j/ C; [3 z2 R6 W% S( u1 oaddition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    4 f5 E' s, C' u7 wscientifically important — they have to be8 h2 F( c3 y. s" N5 i
    solved to pass the course. But in the real
    - P8 W' o4 l9 [7 G9 J: ~3 B! tworld, it’s very hard to know which problems
    0 v! M7 ^5 P4 R  @- D* ~are important, and you never know whether. f3 ~2 d1 o8 p: y8 ?
    at a given moment in history a problem is
    8 Q# f9 x, t' rsolvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
      @% w  g/ A/ icentury, several leading physicists, including3 Z/ T$ F: [5 d  `! C' o
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    ! m" i4 @* A' U  ?/ y/ Lout a theory of the electron. This was partly8 |7 F3 ]: ]+ G: r
    in order to understand why all attempts to6 {* N* e; r& n& ?6 h7 |
    detect effects of Earth’s motion through the7 v" L0 r1 r7 ~6 J$ [9 Q
    ether had failed. We now know that* s! M: c# T: i6 a- D. v8 O
    they were working on the wrong problem.: U" j( x" I( k5 l3 l/ F
    At that time, no one could have developed a. Y% {# f* B: F$ m# S/ J
    successful theory of the electron, because
    6 W7 v7 ~* I) F' F/ Gquantum mechanics had not yet been
    ) s1 O7 _6 t' Y$ Z+ ?* `) h5 m" adiscovered. It took the genius of Albert
    8 `4 i8 p1 b$ V" EEinstein in 1905 to realize that the right" e  I6 p7 L3 \2 V& f9 @- ~) G7 V
    problem on which to work was the effect+ o* f4 I5 @. {  C1 s* a
    of motion on measurements of space and% u6 e! Q: _- E: y% X; z6 P
    time. This led him to the special theory of
    * ]- ]: D9 b0 O2 |relativity. As you will never be sure which
    - j1 o' V. Z6 X5 I4 N+ iare the right problems to work on, most
    9 K0 z: {) Y0 N. z+ l8 v  M+ }8 vof the time that you spend in the laboratory
    2 V6 t6 r  S8 }- n6 b' sor at your desk will be wasted. If you want, L1 s) p+ o, @5 S. E. Z8 h
    to be creative, then you will have to get used, X9 w$ ^8 c' W0 \! u5 s+ N
    to spending most of your time not being0 l4 t# m4 j0 @* i
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    7 _! ~- M* E' Q! lscientific knowledge.
    " i4 ^0 L% v( N  Q$ Q
    4 s- l1 I3 w. w9 x7 m+ p* y6 UFinally, learn something about the history
    7 R! f* |6 O5 Y, K7 ^of science,or at a minimum the history of your9 W( C5 a. y. W# t: \
    own branch of science. The least important$ n$ z) g) F9 z: K' E& X
    reason for this is that the history may actually
    6 h: S, w( |% r. a) T( b( ]; b" abe of some use to you in your own scientific
    * T+ g+ N, O2 v1 Wwork. For instance, now and then scientists
    / F) I! i. s1 ]  R* H: E5 a) lare hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    ' n! K2 q5 x9 Q& rmodels of science that have7 j/ e: K* I2 t/ D) K+ w* I. l
    been proposed by philosophers from Francis
    8 M8 ?. x  c! f6 IBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    4 D7 [% a% M- G3 fThe best antidote to the philosophy of science
    4 z# p/ ^' I" k5 j: [2 `is a knowledge of the history of science.
    2 g$ Z* Y4 u! r/ n4 X' _) PMore importantly, the history of science- w* q6 t8 A) |4 A! d+ v
    can make your work seem more worthwhile- b5 \% z0 I! r( \/ f/ b
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    2 ^$ p% t) g9 C7 Agoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives. U: W2 [4 e" m( _" W% l! E
    probably won’t understand what you’re) ]. O& z1 ]4 T9 K0 ~5 X7 O6 n
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary& T1 y  _0 D; O  ?
    particle physics, you won’t even have the4 Z) |) O/ z; N% e
    satisfaction of doing something that is
    9 E7 E. U( }1 b# Z* m! himmediately useful. But you can get great
    3 h9 H& o; m4 z- G0 Rsatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    - H/ ~) Z3 l0 i: ^+ v9 |science is a part of history.
    # {. F) q7 z8 ~$ s
    ' P" ^" K1 b0 V7 `- K2 `Look back 100 years, to 1903. How
    + q6 [) g- q: v. ^7 ]3 |# cimportant is it now who was Prime Minister
    5 }9 Y- o0 x- U7 A, o$ x/ Zof Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    ' G! D% I- ^. X8 ^6 _0 B4 X1 |5 fUnited States? What stands out as really
    3 f4 c8 j$ V5 Z7 Gimportant is that at McGill University,4 T! ?& d8 d7 H4 E* u2 G( d5 K" i
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were( F# P' {2 k/ L: N  a0 w
    working out the nature of radioactivity.
    : ?- w: M9 t- a  C3 G$ y( J+ \This work (of course!) had practical applications,
      p! d( o3 d& X6 t  m/ f; Q" Jbut much more important were its7 Z8 l- d7 E% h$ |
    cultural implications. The understanding of
    # w+ p) ~' i; Y5 iradioactivity allowed physicists to explain6 E; n# G$ ]/ n8 x" G: L* P  {
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be: j: ?. {3 T; g& K0 T+ D8 [
    hot after millions of years. In this way, it0 K. c3 _$ S' R
    removed the last scientific objection to what1 o- }' S: U- p( E
    many geologists and paleontologists
    - |) ^! W$ s$ O  _% M# |' othought was the great age of the Earth and
    0 H9 M& @! v9 R+ p* `( P, L' vthe Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    : y1 m; m0 b2 u0 q. \had to give up belief in the literal truth of
    , x, w6 ]( z* o5 O( lthe Bible or resign themselves to intellectual
      q  q* T4 i' Y' q# s9 Virrelevance. This was just one step in a
    ' s1 G! T* p$ Y/ o' Z1 k% M7 esequence of steps from Galileo through
    $ ?" p1 Y' d+ O3 ]% a" V# O" g* n7 pNewton and Darwin to the present that,time
    0 C$ s8 F' L  e5 y; {after time,has weakened the hold of religious& m$ O9 d0 v+ }
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays% V5 y$ Q7 X* t/ d6 y
    is enough to show you that this work' a6 E3 p# y# t6 C; M; u
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,6 [  ?$ A2 A4 T& y" u1 p8 f
    of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    $ q* D! X. ?/ b: S1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;4 h6 i2 i* P( E5 W6 m1 s. V( l
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    8 P+ i3 [# b; J5 L/ ~" x* ^/ Y3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    ; O+ p0 N& v( y4 @( Q5 t2 |! ]4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2024-5-8 04:17

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表