设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 5097|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
    & X. C) a- Y5 {# V3 G- c6 B$ K: u4 P9 W; S
    Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    - D+ T( i, R0 C. ?7 g/ Jthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,  g2 y+ {: T/ u) J5 P
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    " e$ T3 W1 G& ^3 [1 Tgiven by the author at the Science Convocation at
    3 f! L+ p1 d( ?: T  D: bMcGill University in June 2003.9 [. x; @: {( \7 R+ N
    ! a+ Z  M6 g; Z- X! C
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years; u; t6 X4 p0 E2 V. @8 t
    ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,6 o9 E  f. h$ v) f  J  T
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    9 `, I/ Q2 H. k$ G/ d0 Kcould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?+ K  u7 y& I8 @" @% ]2 d( i
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the4 i  N; U& h- a0 D& N$ K' K
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start# j! E& R. }% ]' c
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or) B0 `. U; M/ i
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    / z5 |: y: `0 t) |1 {2 b" @, Jthough when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big5 j' V' y- n( b) C$ ]& g
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .% k0 r5 C: k9 ?9 X/ H* v- \* Y7 y

    2 T1 X: Q" _. s; t; P1 S, o0 \Another lesson to be learned, to continue
    & M5 E2 }$ G5 F9 cusing my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    ! Z- d: p* }1 ]+ `while you are swimming and not sinking you
    ' h$ q1 T% F6 z# W+ \: u; Bshould aim for rough water. When I was2 M/ ?8 i/ j& ~; N0 e, R) c0 a
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of
    ; e. U9 X9 j& {4 \) ]0 y$ @: oTechnology in the late 1960s, a student told
    + K" U5 a; y4 v  a0 qme that he wanted to go into general
    ) ?3 W5 _$ `& V3 d3 \! ~* lrelativity rather than the area I was working
    ; A. G2 F" T9 M3 M* {on, elementary particle physics, because
    + |( Y9 b( f8 V: h& U- othe principles of the former were well; a& e, d8 l' @4 J, b! B  [/ n. a
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    ' c4 r! @( P7 q( Q- r5 Zto him. It struck me that he had just given2 ^9 `& ~; _/ b6 R. H3 b, t
    a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.. U) _. ]+ u, J
    Particle physics was an area where9 d9 y2 O+ \, z; k
    creative work could still be done. It really was
    4 J7 K  R, I" p+ u3 p& l, [a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the2 |* S% ^; a, B; A, l1 ^
    work of many theoretical and experimental
    + J4 }; ~/ ^$ _; p: m) G6 l- Sphysicists has been able to sort it out, and
    ' B4 A. k6 q1 L; u4 rput everything (well, almost everything)
    ; i0 S: `% O  ?together in a beautiful theory known as
    7 \" e! j# @' i0 ^9 Nthe standard model.My advice is to go for the8 r1 S# R; l: t
    messes — that’s where the action is.
    + O4 T$ |+ f5 _( {% k$ j% `, Q+ m8 U) ^
    My third piece of advice is probably the- w/ v& t7 x! X( A# D6 \
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for" I. u1 y+ F  q
    wasting time. Students are only asked to
    3 N' m  j9 q1 e  g+ U3 Esolve problems that their professors (unless0 p) o  I2 O: R: m5 }* o/ s9 b: w
    unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In' E- m+ o$ N: \1 l7 t
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    5 a! [( o9 D' G+ q% |- `6 Tscientifically important — they have to be' W- o! S# p7 v# J. X! [3 x
    solved to pass the course. But in the real+ @4 `  L8 I' U5 l+ L" S" y
    world, it’s very hard to know which problems! _( Y* `0 Z( A
    are important, and you never know whether& s2 C- V7 b. d2 \- Z% w
    at a given moment in history a problem is& V7 w' n" [& _* B, u( t
    solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth# B9 x) a2 _4 w& ?
    century, several leading physicists, including' b2 ?' `- d9 k" k" F
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    % W- K/ [" Y% G  e, bout a theory of the electron. This was partly* W  j, G. f& @) i7 R; j
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    2 q7 {9 J6 |+ i& Kdetect effects of Earth’s motion through the( e) s* b2 x, \5 k3 ]: l; {
    ether had failed. We now know that. q$ i4 i2 P8 ^5 E4 z9 M5 m6 h
    they were working on the wrong problem.% ?8 Y9 O+ K- ?2 ^( c0 D9 b
    At that time, no one could have developed a
    " u0 M( E7 U+ Y% n- w  Ssuccessful theory of the electron, because7 P' @+ j9 f3 x$ h0 [8 m$ f6 P
    quantum mechanics had not yet been# c0 x: X  \3 e' _" e
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert
    % T6 H' t7 n3 O9 T3 [Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right  @3 v% {6 w3 W! p" o
    problem on which to work was the effect2 Y9 D- D. M  X; w4 b
    of motion on measurements of space and! Q/ e5 [: K/ _
    time. This led him to the special theory of
    % t6 v! I4 b& k/ S. rrelativity. As you will never be sure which
    4 }; w! n! |3 |5 ~8 V4 }2 _are the right problems to work on, most: i9 F% b& u2 z0 F
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory
    6 \7 Y1 E: h- O1 Sor at your desk will be wasted. If you want
    % z/ Y; T/ x/ {- J; rto be creative, then you will have to get used
    ; _4 C9 ~! v. O+ T6 R1 Mto spending most of your time not being, ?" Z! c6 _1 [
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    & R$ x$ b8 W. |4 R* P3 ?; k+ H8 R. F7 kscientific knowledge.
    ; w8 j$ @# S2 h6 a; |9 h5 V
    * d; M4 V7 o4 X9 ~Finally, learn something about the history
    4 k$ W! ?( L4 x4 G, F* }* G% bof science,or at a minimum the history of your- l& U' x0 t7 x2 d0 R) F
    own branch of science. The least important. H: E7 z  H$ b+ u
    reason for this is that the history may actually6 f* [- w' z  n* {
    be of some use to you in your own scientific/ C/ Z5 b0 i+ e7 ^' j. \4 r! n7 @
    work. For instance, now and then scientists- G0 V& H1 m# V! ~$ \! ?
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    7 [6 V9 z0 m* f* r1 E. pmodels of science that have
    6 x; A3 |+ c& n' A# qbeen proposed by philosophers from Francis
    / `2 y% ]- d  @! \Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.- E& {# _  Y& W6 D0 F
    The best antidote to the philosophy of science
    2 @, L' X) Z7 R' B( Mis a knowledge of the history of science.5 N- U4 b8 Z- Y" q& K
    More importantly, the history of science; z9 i% c  h! g; Y+ J
    can make your work seem more worthwhile
    $ P! X3 L$ Y  I& ?- a. w5 eto you. As a scientist, you’re probably not9 z; p+ _; Q0 o" l
    going to get rich. Your friends and relatives- {- k9 o1 Z' f' \
    probably won’t understand what you’re; n4 C3 f7 I- z0 m
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary/ Q. o% B( h9 e3 u1 d! D
    particle physics, you won’t even have the
    # j+ t% q6 m) g/ g( Ksatisfaction of doing something that is2 m# E2 |+ f+ V9 S8 r: F3 o
    immediately useful. But you can get great2 N( R# D+ }4 {; [. S8 a# m
    satisfaction by recognizing that your work in. m  q1 R& g: g* h  v% j
    science is a part of history.! D( \9 T4 B' A
    % h7 c' I) q- ^7 I$ s# e
    Look back 100 years, to 1903. How/ w, L0 ~/ @! n6 S& ^! O- F
    important is it now who was Prime Minister6 n9 U6 O- {1 f$ I* \! ^
    of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the5 v4 F' S7 @0 s/ |% f7 `4 X& Q7 I
    United States? What stands out as really
    0 s8 w2 A$ m" L& j2 u, c7 cimportant is that at McGill University,7 t: ~0 H1 I  z  v) E- p) k0 m
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were
    ; Q4 o; _% B* Z4 g- a  [5 H! J( uworking out the nature of radioactivity.
    - t: a) m5 g3 _  ^8 z1 D( n5 ^This work (of course!) had practical applications,
    - k1 r  N; m. v. \but much more important were its- D# o) }; n. n6 P. U5 J; w; H' F: q/ E
    cultural implications. The understanding of
    2 v+ m) H) f9 xradioactivity allowed physicists to explain; R! ?( ~( O+ z* X: b7 H
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
    * j4 T* f0 L7 |% Q3 W, vhot after millions of years. In this way, it& q, i! ~% B8 F
    removed the last scientific objection to what9 p+ _) W+ Q8 o0 Z$ h9 }- F0 A
    many geologists and paleontologists
    ' }9 O; E3 d. V% A% }  {thought was the great age of the Earth and0 ~* ?& r& z2 g! Y3 C( `
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    / }0 V7 I. Q! s9 Chad to give up belief in the literal truth of: M* d5 `1 Q3 k% L' s# F+ Y8 n
    the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual. t3 \* C- k; R, o, D/ K
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a; E+ ]: k0 K8 G
    sequence of steps from Galileo through" f( M9 e7 p1 [
    Newton and Darwin to the present that,time
    ' `( ]/ Z% g# g3 j5 K% b& _after time,has weakened the hold of religious
    ) l  \; Z" b, U( Idogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays% n  b* L8 E; t3 G- n
    is enough to show you that this work  G! L0 G0 D! T; ~
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
    $ Q5 K5 ?. R8 wof which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊; E% p1 Z3 M- q+ Q2 h
    1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;
    & S- r  @9 f4 y2 X8 t" v2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;! l) t1 u  ?$ `" h
    3.“浪费时间”是必要的;% x) s$ d7 r, b: Z  M
    4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-10-18 01:34

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表