设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 5104|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
    ( E9 K) r5 u# p7 P% [1 {! T9 @# P
    ) f) b: _# Y0 j. dSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,/ T# Y) b: I: U5 u3 J
    the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,2 a5 E* c  a% D7 B. {5 [" T. f
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    ( C# S. m# Z, w2 y- Ggiven by the author at the Science Convocation at8 o& R1 k1 p# s$ h! ~
    McGill University in June 2003.# K& ^2 `* R1 z/ ?6 t! s
    3 p1 U' |& _" e8 i" x% s
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years& d% C, p6 Q4 C0 I2 W$ Q: {$ g" p
    ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,  f+ `7 u5 V6 n( `
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How9 z% Z) m3 E; P' M5 P
    could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?2 J7 E, {  Y0 z( p9 s4 k
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the5 k: G% ]" w% R5 j9 F. v4 L2 ~
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
    . i) k5 ~9 B% L% \8 I" Sdoing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or4 w9 `2 E. J  w6 J- l* r& C
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —+ r8 R$ h. f, R. [" ?0 H/ t6 u
    though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big- K7 S' k/ B* `) e" [
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .* o0 ~9 t& b# N1 f- k9 B

    ! h! P' L0 i/ z% w9 b, DAnother lesson to be learned, to continue
    5 l9 Q# {. G( W- b" qusing my oceanographic metaphor, is that& w/ o. l) P0 ?3 P% H$ v( C
    while you are swimming and not sinking you3 W# N$ S" }" t, ]5 ^
    should aim for rough water. When I was; b1 @, ]: l3 K6 r/ h
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of3 p6 T# {; p4 E# s# p
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told; _. r/ Z# A8 R; C+ y
    me that he wanted to go into general
    . e5 r' \; I3 Hrelativity rather than the area I was working; ~. Z$ ?0 ~9 M' D1 k! [# |$ T
    on, elementary particle physics, because# x8 O( A' t9 s
    the principles of the former were well
    / U) ~* z% j! W( L: tknown, while the latter seemed like a mess
    3 L& G: ~" s  J9 @to him. It struck me that he had just given
    ! l% D# ~5 i. M$ N: c8 _, [' Ga perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
      o" ^- ]7 |# ?) V7 pParticle physics was an area where
    2 J) Y: `8 R8 C; S1 ]7 J  ?creative work could still be done. It really was% D8 I# A, e4 f  W, l  J
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
    2 S" F. F( Y- T7 R" V" zwork of many theoretical and experimental3 x" _. z1 |" k- h( Z
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and" F7 i4 e& b8 b% T' O
    put everything (well, almost everything)* ^6 s1 R  z) [  ~/ n: D
    together in a beautiful theory known as
    ) h7 `; R5 L* n7 r, y) [$ k; nthe standard model.My advice is to go for the
    ! |* N7 y  Z9 N% P+ t$ C8 e+ ]* Smesses — that’s where the action is.
    , _8 R( e- o, I8 `' _3 d$ z  \  v# r- y$ R$ k0 o
    My third piece of advice is probably the
    / J" L1 u2 ?1 i0 k$ C7 o. Fhardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for4 {" i* p+ w- d6 B1 p! w
    wasting time. Students are only asked to; ^) {4 U& p4 m5 m- m6 i* K
    solve problems that their professors (unless( A. h, K& d7 e; j
    unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In. D. F0 h; w, ?' e3 A0 b( e
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    + f  |! @3 _, Dscientifically important — they have to be; ^6 m) Q9 _% s- Q
    solved to pass the course. But in the real
    0 p2 ]# b/ k* O1 C3 Z. o5 P4 a6 Zworld, it’s very hard to know which problems
    5 O4 K; |9 T% z: a; l# {3 Bare important, and you never know whether* Y# S3 [9 T) X- D6 c8 _
    at a given moment in history a problem is
    3 p- [9 `& U; x) jsolvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    5 u' j2 Q; P/ w* g; t7 rcentury, several leading physicists, including/ C, N; R/ x/ @' N: A3 K8 o$ A
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    ' P1 o( b# i! @8 k: l; sout a theory of the electron. This was partly, z. e; V* m2 R
    in order to understand why all attempts to
    " ~( Z$ m7 U, ]2 d  Hdetect effects of Earth’s motion through the; P5 U% ?6 }2 [( P1 k6 t
    ether had failed. We now know that
    * B9 {% _+ I  z$ }/ ]$ m8 Jthey were working on the wrong problem.
    5 a9 m- m7 ^# l* d5 D: q  DAt that time, no one could have developed a
    " @; |, Y) \; J; ?! l! usuccessful theory of the electron, because6 o" k& z4 R# {4 C' C8 M
    quantum mechanics had not yet been' K! h+ z# v( r. B: m1 w
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert
    9 K1 _  t  ]. M. LEinstein in 1905 to realize that the right/ R5 v0 G# F0 g. q4 y2 q
    problem on which to work was the effect
      @, x) v- s" Cof motion on measurements of space and3 d( j. }9 _" D- @* t
    time. This led him to the special theory of  ~7 `3 q/ o0 x% q" |4 w' x! e/ u
    relativity. As you will never be sure which9 n4 ^3 b9 i& k
    are the right problems to work on, most! X" a( w& ?' F; j* M( d
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory
    3 [& H" g7 i# {9 Y# ?% @or at your desk will be wasted. If you want
    $ z, W: _. q: E( A( mto be creative, then you will have to get used
    $ ^* d! S% d9 G' U/ ?to spending most of your time not being
    . L* s  r# l% D1 x! W& {creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    & ^( E7 z( k7 W7 w( V5 ]scientific knowledge.# k4 M" _% [! F  B
    1 Z: z6 o* @: k3 N: b1 e* o9 B
    Finally, learn something about the history+ D/ q, k) \' }4 x
    of science,or at a minimum the history of your
    3 r8 T5 [  G9 b1 N+ cown branch of science. The least important
    1 V9 v& g) g4 X4 V3 F3 L3 jreason for this is that the history may actually7 Z1 W% j3 F( E3 c* Q9 ?- I
    be of some use to you in your own scientific$ U* ^5 |& W0 @
    work. For instance, now and then scientists
    9 k# {" b3 p4 ]8 O" b, C/ c) E0 E$ kare hampered by believing one of the oversimplified
    ' U% C0 ^$ n8 x! _. ?models of science that have( M! R$ _4 r; U  N/ L. F* @+ x
    been proposed by philosophers from Francis
    5 b+ L9 m  `+ r: B3 s0 S" dBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.' d$ B+ i$ m, d8 J
    The best antidote to the philosophy of science6 ]; `( w' ^" C- Z
    is a knowledge of the history of science.
    $ s& l9 V9 m& z0 DMore importantly, the history of science9 F* C  B8 A3 U+ ]" c
    can make your work seem more worthwhile, \; }2 q( f1 Y6 s  c
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not/ F7 A& s! G! V# t! l
    going to get rich. Your friends and relatives! T# ~- [2 D6 N; y- ^& c2 m2 L
    probably won’t understand what you’re& ~5 Y% h) c; K3 }
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary
    , L5 j: B. h$ q1 h/ }particle physics, you won’t even have the4 S- e6 m# z, ~
    satisfaction of doing something that is3 _) K' A. U; H5 V5 F1 t3 }
    immediately useful. But you can get great
    0 a- k5 D+ q" P  j; n/ S( N6 Osatisfaction by recognizing that your work in% R: K) f; n+ l2 f. W
    science is a part of history., _8 B/ @7 M* V$ n( R
    & I$ F0 o0 x$ z
    Look back 100 years, to 1903. How
    + P8 z/ g$ k2 `important is it now who was Prime Minister" z' f, F* r$ ?+ I
    of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the: J# |5 F: W2 r2 m9 ?% U+ `
    United States? What stands out as really/ a$ `$ p$ f# A; ?" W
    important is that at McGill University,
    " \' @1 }" Q+ u0 y2 BErnest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were
    + P! H  H. I$ L" G/ Zworking out the nature of radioactivity.
    % H9 c% e: U- L# L" z% ]This work (of course!) had practical applications,6 O" u3 l7 }+ l  [# m, R, T
    but much more important were its
    4 V7 e: q% h4 F* b; V* Z' m! xcultural implications. The understanding of+ ~+ b2 `( C1 x% W3 W% q9 m" @6 y, c1 j
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain! W+ m+ K1 \. `! v6 I' x
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be6 h) j. Q& h6 X, Z
    hot after millions of years. In this way, it
    * v3 P5 I+ S8 @5 i2 u/ P2 ]removed the last scientific objection to what3 j. D! S  R0 ]8 U% \
    many geologists and paleontologists1 [  U3 e2 H  U. l9 ^+ a0 H
    thought was the great age of the Earth and
    7 v& h: n4 [& J( i& z  p2 cthe Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    6 K. Q  Y/ `3 R/ Ihad to give up belief in the literal truth of5 t& r; {8 B) w6 n
    the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual, l* f1 U# Y8 K( J
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a
    ( j$ ^5 f: j1 }) r/ Jsequence of steps from Galileo through3 U- i  @" U. g$ H
    Newton and Darwin to the present that,time* Y! M) _3 U6 e/ o4 K5 T
    after time,has weakened the hold of religious
    2 D# A+ x0 o% W6 E: B8 ]dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays! z: A7 l" P7 \/ l
    is enough to show you that this work
    # H9 L. z- a5 p: i+ O  E; mis not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,9 O) T0 V& w7 |, L6 k
    of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    # b( M! @; ~4 h7 |/ i. e& Q1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;; i! b3 |4 q6 e( }% F/ b2 ]; Q9 U9 a
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    ; D! o& y# l% _3.“浪费时间”是必要的;9 V& I* ^" J( C- u
    4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-10-18 22:09

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表