设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 5100|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg
      L. _5 w6 H* [6 L4 m
    : a2 C& S# ?4 P; n! ]: x* g0 JSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
      |' J! C( m) Z2 gthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,4 B4 o& B% t) a4 O6 S
    USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk
    ; r  z8 i& b& z# B& ygiven by the author at the Science Convocation at4 U. |7 H7 L) P# P4 P0 [
    McGill University in June 2003.
    / R$ d7 z! K$ Z& z( n& d' I6 P/ Q! t- M  K  Z: x; U9 F: u( ]; r
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    & r4 b: E% ~0 W( d3 }) `- h& tago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,( O6 G9 ]2 p# [% F# K4 \! X
    every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How
    : S: I. [( J3 c+ B" f% ccould I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?7 w; G3 y3 r: K& c0 |3 R4 j
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the; G8 w  |( r" x6 O
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start
    " h& l, I# J3 {" m- \doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or+ M6 h& r# h2 M% U& G6 a  H# `- C
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —( S" S" b6 U) l* y  m
    though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big& z# h' E4 ~/ V
    thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    % a3 P0 _, Q" {
    $ U9 ?" H; o- O: t+ I+ dAnother lesson to be learned, to continue
    ) Z1 r) J' a$ o4 Busing my oceanographic metaphor, is that
    8 F; B: q- q& h% O3 J- Swhile you are swimming and not sinking you
    8 x4 \) `! g! x8 o5 ishould aim for rough water. When I was1 S3 Y/ E$ c3 s& B8 b& l
    teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of* W+ A! N1 U9 N  y# s# K0 `" ~
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told) q5 @7 b4 d4 }
    me that he wanted to go into general6 J$ l" {7 e% o& |# l
    relativity rather than the area I was working0 l: \, }5 z$ E, W) h; B: Z+ @- |
    on, elementary particle physics, because
    ( J6 w3 c9 e* K# tthe principles of the former were well& I+ d! Z3 r) c6 V
    known, while the latter seemed like a mess
    ( O, l' h, c# U4 u- qto him. It struck me that he had just given$ G" [+ W% `: Q
    a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.9 V- ], u, v8 Z  {; q
    Particle physics was an area where
    ! V6 l9 w# ?: e1 c% {creative work could still be done. It really was3 l! {9 }4 y& a0 a! E% U- ^% \
    a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the4 z5 p' v4 a( ?% G* o# _' `: L. @
    work of many theoretical and experimental; h! J% |( N3 T( b. [
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and
    ) w4 V& a& |9 j4 r/ b: v8 zput everything (well, almost everything)
    / j2 X, ~9 H* K5 ?together in a beautiful theory known as8 L- y% M5 c( ~* p
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the
      p1 e4 L9 P5 v! @' w4 ]! Kmesses — that’s where the action is.% H" s# ]9 a9 P! a

    7 ]* m6 K; L% [My third piece of advice is probably the6 D) v/ T+ ?. \; ~0 c0 O1 ?
    hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for' c* }$ Z# A4 n- P/ I' {- G
    wasting time. Students are only asked to
    & x# t2 c9 {! c* d$ N% csolve problems that their professors (unless
    " ?7 A: v! D4 {) z1 dunusually cruel) know to be solvable. In/ M7 C. V% K( L0 ]$ i
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are
    6 R0 ^) }$ E) F* V! c; Sscientifically important — they have to be
    & X# x; G3 D8 F3 Vsolved to pass the course. But in the real
    ' x0 a! s$ {3 D; r! M: Tworld, it’s very hard to know which problems5 W# _/ Z, n8 ]8 i9 e( K$ N
    are important, and you never know whether8 k; r  H* m  k8 g* i- P
    at a given moment in history a problem is
    . z; M0 D  a. V! @solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    6 J/ y2 Z- Y- B* F8 Y) y7 B" lcentury, several leading physicists, including+ ~6 O4 C$ G$ v1 q3 r
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work
    " g5 ^8 a0 G" O% _1 Kout a theory of the electron. This was partly: Z4 D# X& a7 w1 k0 D2 C4 L5 c
    in order to understand why all attempts to( Y9 A6 Z: K/ q
    detect effects of Earth’s motion through the: [# O8 A( F  }. ^) k+ A8 n
    ether had failed. We now know that
    4 [7 t" Y$ k6 k9 Xthey were working on the wrong problem.
    + H- V6 a/ l# PAt that time, no one could have developed a
    , y" U! {# B% a1 ?- d) V& asuccessful theory of the electron, because  t6 Z# g! q' {- X! I6 N
    quantum mechanics had not yet been
    # D) J. _- j4 w( f4 idiscovered. It took the genius of Albert
    1 e  }# @7 Z! ?. d  UEinstein in 1905 to realize that the right: s: v2 [7 m+ q: d
    problem on which to work was the effect
    " f4 A+ M' d3 Q; @, Q& Gof motion on measurements of space and# R4 V" t/ N4 M) J7 u7 H
    time. This led him to the special theory of
    ' _6 C' e( @7 @6 ]2 {relativity. As you will never be sure which! I7 N2 u4 v/ C) }7 ?
    are the right problems to work on, most# X% J  E! T" Z' p2 _+ b2 A4 A
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory1 s3 x4 \8 T  O1 x( t6 R
    or at your desk will be wasted. If you want7 P% w1 D6 n% ?8 K
    to be creative, then you will have to get used
    2 m$ I" j; V9 S3 h- |. ?4 u+ h' M. qto spending most of your time not being; R" q; U# \; p2 N
    creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of
    9 y" v- u0 I( ]) t- yscientific knowledge.
    0 U9 D4 Z0 `. j; A, L$ G9 n* t- H0 q9 E1 G, B9 t2 {/ ^* g2 L/ K
    Finally, learn something about the history
    & [8 F: d7 z9 y+ \of science,or at a minimum the history of your6 Y: a! T3 |, c; ~. G7 R5 v/ B4 }
    own branch of science. The least important! T$ l: w' L" E) s: H7 f
    reason for this is that the history may actually+ @# t  O1 [/ S1 [
    be of some use to you in your own scientific
    . h+ K: h# P. ]( mwork. For instance, now and then scientists1 l& J4 x# }/ F; |
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified# z3 M& }; r$ r) d6 h. B7 F% O9 g
    models of science that have
    + j! w! j+ F1 Q6 c4 D. obeen proposed by philosophers from Francis. a" f  J3 v/ w6 n1 G6 n
    Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.+ S; y$ @3 i( v- D
    The best antidote to the philosophy of science
    0 V* u0 Y# q9 V$ q+ J  g/ k; Mis a knowledge of the history of science.
    $ V( [- F6 p/ p& Q8 w5 UMore importantly, the history of science; ?- T7 Z4 y/ z* ~1 h
    can make your work seem more worthwhile& A* U* ?% M8 h& x2 r
    to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not
    & i2 s9 C) e/ t+ _. Y8 G" `! dgoing to get rich. Your friends and relatives
    ( P: c1 I2 K- c4 Bprobably won’t understand what you’re5 S! ~4 Q- n& Y; ~+ @
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary# B' |$ T, A9 n1 h- G% W
    particle physics, you won’t even have the
    5 q3 h; X  U! @satisfaction of doing something that is3 S" O* [4 l  A8 C0 t$ Q) V
    immediately useful. But you can get great
    * Z5 y, X% {3 K2 A- J- T2 dsatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    1 `8 @) K" b2 C1 U9 U9 Fscience is a part of history.: y4 l- J2 d( K

    : i- c7 `( _6 r8 y) @Look back 100 years, to 1903. How# \' J( t+ \& t* I! b' _9 N
    important is it now who was Prime Minister8 f  ?# M- S  M. [0 K( ~, {' o" b& u
    of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    1 g( k3 J* }0 UUnited States? What stands out as really0 s9 T5 E4 ?3 n( {/ h6 g- V
    important is that at McGill University,
    / G, N' v4 G+ d6 P; ?$ S" `, }2 \Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were% E% ]6 X, |; {! {9 x% l
    working out the nature of radioactivity.
    : n. s$ H6 i/ k4 Z% O0 k  dThis work (of course!) had practical applications,4 {& n4 z) V* J" M1 {# k3 w
    but much more important were its$ T: J+ ^. p$ ^
    cultural implications. The understanding of
    1 ^1 r% X7 X# Xradioactivity allowed physicists to explain2 `# T' u3 L6 T  m( J
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be6 X9 ~( c% J+ c# y7 X
    hot after millions of years. In this way, it) j6 O  e) N  C- O1 }
    removed the last scientific objection to what
    - d# i% J+ F7 y5 Kmany geologists and paleontologists: o0 J3 w! H# S7 ?; }
    thought was the great age of the Earth and1 y; j: \. @8 G4 e& `  h
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either
    : ]# Q+ {4 C( v3 a1 R- y$ i7 _/ {' G* ghad to give up belief in the literal truth of
    . W. ^1 m# W7 Ithe Bible or resign themselves to intellectual3 w" w) R/ p, Y- d, `" ^
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a6 A' z8 V: e6 L0 H) G+ g
    sequence of steps from Galileo through) _7 c+ i6 c: G8 A5 B  |3 E7 E# z. ]
    Newton and Darwin to the present that,time
    / r+ _5 D0 u: j4 P  a. m( X* [( bafter time,has weakened the hold of religious8 u. P7 k8 k1 Z8 ~" G- n
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays( a& F2 t! ]4 \# b
    is enough to show you that this work: N+ D# D# a2 w+ w0 v- L4 n
    is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,
    . H# ?* ~! t2 Q) Y! L7 kof which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊4 h" r  N/ U( B' p, K- i0 t
    1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;* u: s! k6 w+ Q
    2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;  r+ `! X) E  _9 T# p
    3.“浪费时间”是必要的;* k  W' n8 t. ^& m5 O  Y
    4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-10-18 03:22

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表