设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文 快速切换版块

 找回密码
 立即加入
搜索
查看: 4971|回复: 21

给研究生的四条金律

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2017-7-12 08:29
  • 签到天数: 7 天

    连续签到: 2 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    累计签到:7 天
    连续签到:2 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 19:39:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    论文文献
    标题: 给研究生的四条金律
    作者: Steven Weinberg
    所属专业方向: Education
    摘要: This essay is based on a commencement talk
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    McGill University in June 2003
    关键字:
    来源:

    马上加入,结交更多好友,共享更多资料,让你轻松玩转电力研学社区!

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即加入

    ×
    Steven Weinberg# w2 M+ O! {: y3 v1 \

    ! Z8 O( ^$ Q3 Y* JSteven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics,
    # S7 w9 X; B  q: K0 C% qthe University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712,
    0 W! }9 m* N3 e7 }: gUSA. This essay is based on a commencement talk: {7 R3 V( s. M$ M( t
    given by the author at the Science Convocation at
    ' G6 J3 l5 B" x' n4 h$ TMcGill University in June 2003.+ v) h! k( w' n% y6 `- g  S5 {0 {( Z
    $ U% T# f# v% u( {% P, Z4 v
    When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years
    & x. y) _8 m( o. y5 Q" jago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean,
    - O6 S, P' b5 @  N7 ?5 [every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How1 b( H/ D, {5 C0 E: Q$ |/ P. ~
    could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done?3 |* G  o( Q* L( e+ _7 a9 P4 |
    Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the+ b9 E" {) L; N9 [8 p) L& [4 e
    hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start( j# |/ t" G5 ?/ _
    doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or& b1 D# }; }7 j5 M+ D( E
    swim. To my surprise, I found that thisworks. I managed to get a quick PhD —
    ( I: I* L" Y% W9 ~though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big
    9 h% p/ ^- [: }& A% A9 d0 _thing: that no one knows everything, and you don’t have to .
    . m: C' m* t9 L' y) W9 h  b! `2 J# d7 s  G
    Another lesson to be learned, to continue+ {& }7 b1 E* @( W
    using my oceanographic metaphor, is that# s' w. {1 Z% s* [) W
    while you are swimming and not sinking you
    5 N2 l, z  F4 T2 W* pshould aim for rough water. When I was
    . `9 [& L6 |1 m3 Gteaching at the Massachusetts Institute of6 s/ L8 X  j- m+ t2 b0 ?9 t& {
    Technology in the late 1960s, a student told! f( v' b( [. P: T- ?
    me that he wanted to go into general
    2 j" [0 T) ?7 Q, D8 Yrelativity rather than the area I was working. W. N/ Z& \! K
    on, elementary particle physics, because5 ?, ]/ \5 I/ L8 c4 i
    the principles of the former were well
    * z5 P' N8 r! |! Bknown, while the latter seemed like a mess  G7 T. R1 r0 N- B/ t7 I
    to him. It struck me that he had just given
    , @# H) ]9 b6 _. xa perfectly good reason for doing the opposite.
    / B3 R. h+ b; Z( MParticle physics was an area where! g- h; n& m6 ?; b
    creative work could still be done. It really was
    ' p/ w6 E7 _) |2 s1 [& c) u+ |a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the
    8 i# @" Y% h. \: Mwork of many theoretical and experimental; d2 s8 |5 ?4 u* C  I% A
    physicists has been able to sort it out, and
    ! x+ A+ _, N% x3 W0 q8 t' Vput everything (well, almost everything)
    ; J+ b; S% S1 ~0 Rtogether in a beautiful theory known as' r9 X! t* h  s
    the standard model.My advice is to go for the( ?/ j5 i; z9 F1 E6 k, j
    messes — that’s where the action is.$ m7 v# i& P$ [( l! T$ m

    , s+ @. A2 T8 j2 S3 }" k) [; `& }My third piece of advice is probably the
    ; s& H( A9 O1 d/ \- O+ R; ghardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for- C- y' ?8 w) h5 Y* ^/ g
    wasting time. Students are only asked to
    % s# z9 ]) g5 S! p$ r1 z+ Dsolve problems that their professors (unless( I9 ^" Q3 V; x, }
    unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In& N& b) Z9 q# V$ m+ ~: w, |# L
    addition,it doesn’t matter if the problems are% v& c3 @0 {& r- N" F4 ?- S$ y
    scientifically important — they have to be
    2 Z3 z3 V% J' l3 |' i. Ysolved to pass the course. But in the real
    8 j! o# g+ a3 a: c) xworld, it’s very hard to know which problems
    1 k3 j2 ?, V1 b* V) w1 E' J4 Rare important, and you never know whether
    9 \# z4 O# {% W9 q& wat a given moment in history a problem is7 x- d8 ?  x& _3 P1 l/ ?. P/ a! @; V
    solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth
    4 x/ x- B0 A8 A% r2 v4 Y4 }. A9 W( Acentury, several leading physicists, including5 Q6 f" o5 |9 X7 @1 f- H5 w( ]; E" y
    Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work. }9 j! E+ Q, Y: p+ w  G
    out a theory of the electron. This was partly* d6 s% r. n8 r: u, E% o) h( X
    in order to understand why all attempts to# ^: k+ e/ i2 F! b3 ?+ f4 E
    detect effects of Earth’s motion through the
    0 t% R1 A! U* K* h, kether had failed. We now know that
    ; r. z2 i" r) z, cthey were working on the wrong problem.+ }: W1 S1 {5 g1 w1 O/ s
    At that time, no one could have developed a5 g2 H" P- \) \8 ]% V$ {
    successful theory of the electron, because; k) S+ \! j* u
    quantum mechanics had not yet been$ f: [$ y  ?/ w& t' z
    discovered. It took the genius of Albert$ |& ]2 \$ F0 P& X; `
    Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right, s0 x. |- o: |( H$ ?; H( l
    problem on which to work was the effect' R' I% D; r) x! a8 f
    of motion on measurements of space and
    8 a8 H+ F. h7 f2 D0 x& A% J; Itime. This led him to the special theory of
    / t5 G( k: y' `# u! ~* frelativity. As you will never be sure which
    " b$ W4 x# B$ c0 iare the right problems to work on, most! f. F# R3 c. f; X
    of the time that you spend in the laboratory
    ) _" ^: @8 H2 M- }, t4 o+ j$ ror at your desk will be wasted. If you want
    . G3 q2 V1 Z2 q9 `/ C/ E: `1 e4 tto be creative, then you will have to get used
    0 r. Y" m9 h2 K5 Q5 g0 @6 ^9 Cto spending most of your time not being
    # ~1 P- z& \) c8 }creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of, l, ~: v3 I* N: o
    scientific knowledge., y( }2 e* ]3 c+ R5 Y3 O

    ; C- j0 A1 @: D( CFinally, learn something about the history
    5 |$ h. }2 r- j& a5 L5 F0 [( Wof science,or at a minimum the history of your+ ~0 U+ t/ [! J# @& D( }
    own branch of science. The least important( {3 B) U2 [" d( S- V  @
    reason for this is that the history may actually
    7 b# R4 v( [# ?be of some use to you in your own scientific
    . ~3 l- \- u* e" O+ t8 Awork. For instance, now and then scientists3 {' s, p- |, W+ Q/ |
    are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified( ]. u3 p1 B7 j- `5 f5 y$ J
    models of science that have
    % R# O5 p9 c! _7 e8 M1 b/ Z" Ubeen proposed by philosophers from Francis
    ) h+ l, m# C- P8 Q" G$ D# RBacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper.
    4 _% k8 ]$ J4 _The best antidote to the philosophy of science* t6 G. M: C2 z5 x' T2 S1 m' }
    is a knowledge of the history of science.8 W1 D( n4 s' [9 q
    More importantly, the history of science
    5 @1 P2 ?; N$ a7 z3 P% dcan make your work seem more worthwhile
    # U9 A1 E9 C; L8 [to you. As a scientist, you’re probably not4 m- X8 R5 H, s& h( `& `5 E
    going to get rich. Your friends and relatives8 N7 G2 O$ x. R% m6 Y$ e3 ]: p
    probably won’t understand what you’re$ O7 e3 T8 x8 V
    doing.And if you work in a field like elementary( x8 B$ s1 {* F& E0 D' _9 f
    particle physics, you won’t even have the4 V  o+ B  B" @. U
    satisfaction of doing something that is
    # T2 ~. v* F2 ~! Simmediately useful. But you can get great
    % h8 B6 |1 J6 M( N+ H. t4 n8 `0 hsatisfaction by recognizing that your work in
    3 `- {7 d! D6 S. zscience is a part of history.
    ' F8 b- q4 n8 D
    ) B( J0 V( y0 g5 j* bLook back 100 years, to 1903. How
    ; ~, `' U4 g% M$ ?  w6 P) f8 Yimportant is it now who was Prime Minister4 w2 s/ {7 M+ n9 k. C. V- H$ J
    of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the
    / e' d/ N  a8 C9 ?7 u- ]United States? What stands out as really/ d0 ?+ f  ~% g/ n9 }8 M; i
    important is that at McGill University,! @/ I0 ^9 b- _8 `, n  m
    Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were2 f; X5 w" Z+ v9 f8 `
    working out the nature of radioactivity.) [, h' y. ~" A3 p4 {
    This work (of course!) had practical applications,4 ?6 {( E& X2 o" U, `$ R$ z
    but much more important were its; l  |  ^$ v! H. }
    cultural implications. The understanding of% G2 c4 y" k! O; f6 X8 i# j2 [
    radioactivity allowed physicists to explain2 A0 R: h( R0 O! x" @
    how the Sun and Earth’s cores could still be
      U- b5 \6 V0 v2 o& i( v& R5 u. `hot after millions of years. In this way, it& q1 l: s; Y5 y; o
    removed the last scientific objection to what' v) N9 r. G$ f# ^% O3 m& E/ X
    many geologists and paleontologists
    3 h. z: o$ b! }) K2 I1 p1 u+ D4 wthought was the great age of the Earth and+ I! k5 B6 {% P& E8 R( v
    the Sun.After this,Christians and Jews either7 ?/ P1 H7 ~* y# y
    had to give up belief in the literal truth of
    0 J8 u$ y& A# ^$ u8 ~# i% ?the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual. q: F+ s. D5 x! b
    irrelevance. This was just one step in a
    * ~3 [% q% _3 Bsequence of steps from Galileo through
    1 c" \' C; L, M4 LNewton and Darwin to the present that,time
    / V! K" M! n$ [: Jafter time,has weakened the hold of religious* i0 E4 I6 `& H3 \/ U+ c
    dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays
    , C* U- ]* x8 C# m7 a" a# f! dis enough to show you that this work
    8 ?; x5 y: G7 D) D5 i. b3 ?is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work,) O8 ?: h" |/ H  x0 J1 T
    of which scientists are able to feel proud.
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    楼主热帖
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-5-18 19:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
    顶一下哈哈哈哈
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2017-3-23 15:18
  • 签到天数: 2 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:2 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 20:30:59 | 显示全部楼层
    支持一下!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2018-2-2 08:17
  • 签到天数: 1 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.1]初来乍到

    累计签到:1 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-5-18 21:35:45 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的啊,有些意思不知道理解的准确不
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 15:51:40 | 显示全部楼层
    自己的理解的啊
    : d% N" D3 ~1 ^1.没有人可以无所不知,你也不必无所不知;
    2 i; f4 n8 g3 n( o- Y8 c, N2.选择混乱,那是活力所在;
    $ w& N  f: e: ^3 r4 r3.“浪费时间”是必要的;
    + C" ?8 V# ~$ o3 L* O' B1 C4.学点科学史。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-8 16:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
    乎,英文的啊,哎,估计理解不准了。
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2020-4-27 20:29
  • 签到天数: 84 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.6]常住居民II

    累计签到:84 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-14 23:30:27 | 显示全部楼层
    楼主翻译一下嘛!要不发到英语区也行
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
  • TA的每日心情
    郁闷
    2017-3-3 09:47
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    连续签到: 1 天

    [LV.2]偶尔看看I

    累计签到:4 天
    连续签到:1 天
    发表于 2009-9-15 09:41:00 | 显示全部楼层
    四条定律 ???
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 09:53:59 | 显示全部楼层
    you han yu pin yin ban de ma ...
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】

    该用户从未签到

    尚未签到

    发表于 2009-9-15 13:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
    英文的哟~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "真诚赞赏,手留余香"
    还没有人打赏,支持一下
    帖文化:【文明发帖 和谐互动】 社区精神:【创新、交流、互助、共享】
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即加入

    本版积分规则

    招聘斑竹

    小黑屋|手机版|APP下载(beta)|Archiver|电力研学网 ( 赣ICP备12000811号-1|赣公网安备36040302000210号 )|网站地图

    GMT+8, 2026-4-30 19:26

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

    © 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表