KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see6 i0 U1 F& u0 ]* M0 ?4 F2 g! F* S5 k
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size ) B# @: n) K/ `9 V8 D! }24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at % f1 e; P: n! V7 }. y; P& yexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, 9 O( k# d6 k: H, I6 x O3 Tdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems & }4 _8 l o H9 K0 U+ Mrequire a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the , G6 b& _4 @; ~, i"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should 0 K9 V$ U- M. xbe compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the / j. n- v; v% u" ]4 a d"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different 7 a: Q% n6 u; {& }$ iTACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows: r5 Z* k* W7 d# I, y9 d TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ! e1 |" x( H/ S4 j4 k REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 9 x; o. D6 @* t, s+ h% W/ D1 P. y# H INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 24 W7 A6 e, q3 d; x: k$ c0 Z* @7 P
Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 Q+ w- _- A+ D i' }1 M% WThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were:! B1 r8 U& s1 P8 n1 G
TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278 # `" D+ ^( Q2 z" u2 _