KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see8 s% h- z+ u" _! I1 E$ V3 b( ~
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size+ z: T1 J# g$ x0 y# h% i1 b
24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at9 O: s+ v! W$ v4 N1 M3 l
execution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, * y8 ^* L& [+ B: M0 @4 V) Q7 Hdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems ( F1 z! c! K5 j# E( hrequire a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the; U) R4 E9 e$ b% ]/ }
"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should " [) {4 p, e, tbe compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the4 O8 U8 G8 W# D) U- o& z" E7 @
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different ! t4 r) A1 t: @TACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:; a1 T$ `, v) F1 `0 k6 r7 p$ h
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ) _5 l R, A0 Z! `' I3 I2 `# P) [ REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 7 \' e. c2 [9 p% V INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 # c, y- X2 w6 M) z5 h Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 9 K4 |' Y8 E& s; }: k, R# m) YThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: 1 \$ j" x a4 Q! j T, v TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278 $ x" Q/ `' M; u