KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see ' a4 [7 [2 _, v/ Y( ]/ K"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size " r% A( g4 L2 L: G/ x7 ^$ o1 g24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at: \" H$ G) |: ^! L
execution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, 3 z- H9 |/ }$ A" U' Ydynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems 2 w6 C0 J6 p. q4 A) P( W1 Drequire a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the' t# _& C$ |! L. S) P& F4 ]. g- M; L1 G
"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should : y. y1 q G. h* P) Fbe compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the0 A6 f1 c' s$ P5 w7 O7 j5 o" \5 d
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different 4 z# n3 p* S( h# ^9 oTACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:6 Y' o' z" t& o8 k8 Y: i% u# f
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8; h, p3 `+ k! [3 D* X1 Y
REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 64 d% b" f. Y8 F
INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 + @1 J8 e+ D b Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 85 q) s8 N' d* m) W/ Z% W
The TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: ; m; i5 f/ f4 H. j4 b TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278- m: b5 U* r# |5 a8 J5 z4 ]6 ~