KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see @# [' u' i, B" Q
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size ) G( I6 V" w. G4 j24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at . H) }- V8 H5 S) yexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP,; I* p2 M& Y, W! y
dynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems ( G* t& j1 z" b! Q$ h3 P$ ~! ~, Srequire a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the 8 P- m5 Z( O7 u) {( b o, ["Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should ; t/ }* O* R" ^8 _7 {6 n) ^be compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the 6 p' n, d v. [% {, T! ^"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different/ B8 Q- U$ M4 _1 |- D; q
TACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:( C8 h7 Q, L" T' R' w x' D
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 + t# Y5 T& d2 E2 ]4 q" D REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 3 C( ?; |! p) k( M" _ INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 # `+ F+ {; u" X" R; o Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 t# C" y# z+ f3 n
The TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were:- v6 \$ t; z$ ]
TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 42783 g" J |/ ?0 N; @" |