KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see1 \7 v- B; ]" A5 {. v
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size + s' O* [( y" R6 } q) {! _24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at " U, l2 ^3 K8 W Fexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, 1 S" ?0 H+ w j, i8 bdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems. Q1 E, F& r2 j) M+ k! |- L6 H
require a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the 3 l7 u2 c: @3 t% I"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should( P- }1 a- C8 [8 x' ~' z7 \+ i
be compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the ( b0 u" O) k: J1 h5 V4 h"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different2 I5 s8 m- O; c7 M: p- o
TACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows: 3 A! H) j2 m# p, n5 g TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g2 K% N) d/ C6 G: D% d/ y3 ^ REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6, I" a5 L. k1 j* O4 D8 G3 J+ \' x: u
INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 9 E; U9 n' d: f. Q Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 $ l/ @5 K+ S/ V6 J p" gThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were:$ V) H; P; P4 @3 K9 ?
TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278. M/ r6 Y0 ^* Q: e6 g& S