KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see3 J- s3 B; ?4 i& h# i
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size9 _1 X1 Q* {* a( \/ X) J5 H i4 C
24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at 6 z( m' x& n: H& L6 rexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, ! U' i. X$ Y& [9 D. p: ldynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems$ h5 d8 x. l+ R0 W
require a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the, s& ~3 ~0 L7 W( @
"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should3 D" J9 E* C( W! _* _
be compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the* z- b9 k/ \. Y5 ?
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different # a: s$ W! p7 @- _* uTACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:0 f/ E* D: V% w
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 n9 y* ?/ i9 g7 B$ o7 \6 l REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 * W8 l0 H5 Y1 Z5 P+ ~4 W5 ] INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 2 ?- ]( \2 ^ {& v Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 4 H2 A! x( A' [6 K6 T: r# v+ AThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: ( m2 y! L* w+ _4 ~5 s5 m TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278. _- L( A- j% I