KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see: g8 Z/ j! u, }2 C" y1 n3 G5 w
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size $ u. ?4 X1 a+ K. p( h+ k24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at: v S7 J& Y/ L+ k' Q1 e
execution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, 7 l2 m$ g3 j/ s/ s. A) k( o) mdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems \& p) J6 c' M
require a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the7 v4 u; c( r0 d) j1 @
"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should 4 a" A" S! G5 n+ n- Z7 t( z0 lbe compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the1 w6 ^# \" Y, T; S* K# v
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different 3 @( M: n' F2 ?! jTACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:# J* `; ?: g; H' H) n2 _0 h
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ! D% W" @! }6 P REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 9 q/ K! ~! P+ H4 R% u! t INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2' I# i. e5 b P, F' S+ _
Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 ( z1 h/ C9 W0 o* Q% x+ E4 w, wThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: 7 B ~9 L) a5 G' T! j5 T TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 42780 j# L1 z# \5 v/ C5 b& M2 K8 A3 I: _