KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see- E4 _9 b! M9 }) F* O; W
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size+ g! ~" `; L( n2 e" L0 t' P5 |) o
24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at : V* n1 U% y) M3 b# qexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP,9 P2 N3 ? b/ K1 E4 Y
dynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems M' ?8 I0 w6 U' t
require a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the 6 M% B* K7 A# ]# u"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should & x7 A0 V2 J- _be compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the# n6 J0 W1 D7 D% H! i, h
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different& K0 l& n( t' e+ d) g2 U
TACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows: " Y J* }" D* w& z1 M8 m8 s8 ~6 ~. \ TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 & D) G+ A4 l8 |: M REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6" B: p, j! N4 T; T8 w3 D, U
INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 20 }+ o4 g6 a) [. D3 [
Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 85 k8 v5 A- q+ H7 R6 [
The TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were:' m6 ?" F/ N5 N- P* o
TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278 * J0 {* q0 j& n, o2 d/ [