You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following. @3 v3 H( a {0 M, [7 \5 X# q
message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where |+ L$ p: ?! f& {9 o3 o8 _" {
the "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card# G- ~+ n1 y1 R/ j4 J& n* {! R o
is generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been & W! w1 f- S/ b1 C8 {displayed, so a copy follows: % O) S+ ~/ P' v5 ^5 g+ d( [ "14source 0 311. 50. -1. 1." 1 o, `- L W/ G, X KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number 7 S9 X( S7 z) _7 [1 Z. H) G2 e 12 5 4246: S6 V& [( A! a" N2 B
KILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously {/ G7 ^7 W; h: s) @0 h6 H: udefined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "source". The user is not allowed to connect 3 D9 R) b3 O( _% fsources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data) e; ~2 v! K- G$ }/ f! A" X0 R
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or . I0 I3 ^: H! r9 \6 i- b f# V* Lmore spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP1 m: C9 T! W( y) R, D ` U
data cards.7 i- y' a: X! s# L
9 A' ?! M, U+ r1 d/ R3 L 0 L6 B+ H; Z \; `1 L& x6 Zatp中的data card是: u2 R, ~( L6 f# _
什么东西来的?