You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following 0 N- M2 P" f7 G- z7 X; I# `message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where" \6 s7 g' t7 S# A5 w
the "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card . k# j3 W# p# o4 M7 t- {/ His generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been& o# M& g% u5 H! c V3 j" c- l4 F
displayed, so a copy follows: 2 `2 [. a8 M! E8 b/ ^) @ "14source 0 311. 50. -1. 1." 8 v* A" e: o& u R7 ? KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number/ H5 L7 \" Z2 B+ x0 T1 F( H
12 5 4246 & ] x8 H* y l: E! x) V6 FKILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously , \$ |' W' S5 P3 g( t0 e: ydefined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "source". The user is not allowed to connect 6 k5 j/ d9 {2 W3 v8 b6 csources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data9 K/ q/ P! ^$ p' T3 g+ ^+ {
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or 6 C( A+ B( Q2 Smore spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP. m4 i4 T& L' h0 _6 \) n. \' Z) q, L
data cards.4 _ ]0 B, l7 e# j# j7 w2 Q) r