You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following; {6 b: W0 y6 S" }9 F
message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where 9 E! K/ i: w. _, u5 A: ythe "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card 8 q( T: j \1 ~4 Z& n# Ais generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been 5 z6 q* O# Z9 L9 ]2 ?4 udisplayed, so a copy follows:4 T# @! }% e, C" t
"14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1."* a' _ e- G! w' B* r
KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number " j2 X' I0 M4 [3 q- \- [+ L/ { 12 5 4246 i8 {* `( r/ ~% TKILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously # r- `1 N4 M/ O+ odefined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect8 ~0 }! F1 j5 M7 Q1 w* V* P
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data( y" p. O( B7 R* C1 V+ t: T7 ^2 Y
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or7 Z/ G( R/ u6 {! c1 G t$ A5 {+ H
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.