You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following ' t3 |; j( B( C9 [! ^; K8 |message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where2 N- {) B2 y4 K
the "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card4 i; b. Y" x# Z5 @
is generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been# k/ c. m8 E( s! ^5 A$ A
displayed, so a copy follows: / N0 T/ d" t! L# ?+ p8 ^ "14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1." . ~8 `5 M0 r" \+ L+ H0 L KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number! J1 g7 t8 l3 D9 D3 Z0 ^: p
12 5 4246 7 A( O( C( k7 @KILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously' N9 K \* G. ?! ]
defined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect# j- N0 Y7 C$ C1 j$ F
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data* R8 g: r0 _" V4 s
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or( C1 V. m6 E7 M W. Z) w3 w
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.