You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following Q* |; A; M+ d( a2 \: ?message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where5 Q, N5 F6 F" v/ n H
the "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card & e5 K; i4 R b. Y0 Eis generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been - F/ p8 P" g0 M+ @8 }2 f4 C& X* bdisplayed, so a copy follows: 4 v, P8 K _4 Q9 ^" w. M "14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1." 7 K9 q) f& `9 G KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number3 p- o3 O7 O6 Z2 R
12 5 4246 4 s0 A9 a% g- u* M! zKILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously$ b0 I6 F! E% A o1 L
defined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect O _6 A- |" A# ]- k! Y/ q
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data ; `( k( m6 O) E2 s9 kcase. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or, m E {0 ~( R) Q0 c
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.