You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following 0 p' X5 S5 {9 i( m Q! \message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where 7 B0 y0 }4 R' u3 J7 J) D) j7 g& {the "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card. ~' ]* |2 q( z9 ^0 k$ T/ B
is generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been1 T8 s5 M$ I$ _- Z6 p; a; }5 Z
displayed, so a copy follows: : s5 X0 l4 ~# A* Q8 f" N "14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1." ) p* @! M# l0 F, U8 K KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number 1 p1 K9 g( ~8 { 12 5 4246 8 B- v& }4 [! I/ l9 OKILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously + M% I, Y3 l, S- vdefined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect1 k; e ?+ i7 [
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data4 w5 ~. S2 Q0 ]6 x5 P4 h
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or$ \, b2 z# l- o
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.