用PSCAD仿真双馈风力发电大半年了都没有满意结果，实在没办法，现寻有偿指导！

alenyoung

我也在搞双馈风机的仿真。可以交流。

yizhangsjtu

回复 1# rosickywang
2 ]2 \( p5 p) d! d6 f* T6 D2 u

) ?( V! m! H* ?, }3 B    The DFIG simulation case is posted on the website of pscad.com. What is your problem on it. That case works pretty good.
- @* K2 E, ^; J6 y. W, W' YThe only thing not perfect is the loss of the bridge, which in most case people don't care that much.
7 h3 S" Z+ G: w) ~6 Z
The theory of DFIG is also open to public. You can reference the paper of Pena on IEE.
. g; n. {& x0 |1 n* l* A
A difference of the PSCAD sample case and the paper is the CPWM (not PWM) is used on rotor site converter control. This simplified the control, but still works well.

2 a, b0 e3 N5 x# TYou should have a case and read the paper. If you still have trouble, see and your teacher. It is not very good to hang up there for 6 month.

Good luck.

rosickywang

回复 12# yizhangsjtu
* ?8 n" `$ K% H9 E
8 n" h8 x& c. b. j  b% g" h0 k& V
   
你好，谢谢你的帮助。对于你说的几点，我的理解如下：1.The DFIG simulation case is posted on the website of pscad.com. What is your problem on it. That case works pretty good.以前官网中那个模型电机容量是500 [MVA]，很多参数都不满足需要，所以我想修改下，然后就涉及到一些参数选择和计算问题。最新的模型，很多波形的效果都不是很好。
2.The theory of DFIG is also open to public. You can reference the paper of Pena on IEEE。很多参考文献中，转子侧的控制都是采用的间接电流控制，即通过电压去控制转子电流。而官网中的模型采用的是直接电流控制。所以我一直是在这个模型的基础上，去改转子侧变流器的控制策略，结果不理想。
$ r" O/ H# a7 F/ n我想请问你是如何考虑上面提到的这两点问题的：即参数的修改和控制策略的改变。

yizhangsjtu

回复 13# rosickywang
$ w( U. {. g6 n5 _I can see you are doing real work. The two points you proposed are the core problem for this case.
, g) ~8 V5 `) y7 ?
$ n, n2 W# H; }1. Yes, many of the parameters in control are derived from the machine parameters. Those control constants is not arbitrary chosen, but by calculation.

- t' f5 Q( M# L0 M4 V# [* M2. As I mentioned in the previous message, the CPWM is used in the sample case. This treatment avoided a very hard part of the control-how to decouple the rotor side converter control. Personally I don't like this simplification very much. But it seems work fine.
' @; A: E6 U; J0 C
3 s7 `  G6 z. i7 VThose are not simple questions that can be explained here. Please let me know which university you are, let me see if I can find someone to help you locally.

dywedywe

回复 14# yizhangsjtu
! Y" Z/ N; E5 k1 g5 o( a9 ]$ r

   您好，我是华北电力大学的，是否可以也顺便指导我一下，我的方向是功率控制（direct power control)

redplum

谢谢你的资料

renben2

我也帮你顶一顶！

face4

回复 12# yizhangsjtu
, ^/ L: B3 ~' @1 c

% D' X. C2 }; P7 W( \- ]1 B1 U0 ]    请问一下，为什么论坛中的其他例子我可以下载，DFIG的例子却下载不了呢？这个资源已经不在了？

hhp358765804

回复 3# norika


2 R% F) o! V* u: E  w    PI参数调节常用口诀：
1 H4 R: a7 z7 @( C7 I* i参数调整找最佳，从小到大顺序查；
先是比例后积分，最后再把微分加；
曲线振荡很频繁，比例度盘要放大；
( E6 I% u2 a3 D) d曲线漂浮绕大弯，比例度盘往小扳；
曲线偏离回复慢，积分时间往下降；
) z4 }! j1 A- B( r% h$ ]' P曲线波动周期长，积分时间再加长；
曲线振荡频率快，先把微分降下来；
# p& {8 o: T. H) H动差大来波动慢，微分时间应加长；
理想曲线两个波，前高后低4比1。
' @$ n/ y" E3 c  _" u1 U希望有用！！！！

face4

请问，PI调节的时候不是应该先单端调完再调双端吗，那么在双馈电机里，这个该怎么调呢？谢谢。