KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see- n' X/ G' V" G* u/ K1 i
"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size % R# O/ M/ U- {$ N" }24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at $ ~3 N+ `5 b) a* O* \: W0 c6 Fexecution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, % N- U$ [- x( P4 I9 vdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems# V! S; C O* o* S6 @8 k% _
require a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the 7 c7 W/ G& b/ A: e1 e9 |6 N"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should+ X. \- z4 ?5 g% P8 [
be compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the+ h3 d4 {& o4 |8 P
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different $ \, h6 i5 s" Y7 N0 {# [ h q- XTACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows: 2 F& ?. U$ i+ k$ u: k TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84 Q: n2 }. p% }. C7 w
REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 6 / \ I g# N4 c1 c8 s INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 6 E6 T: H" a3 n l. r4 | Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8 ' B2 E1 f7 {4 _6 U, F* U0 o) ZThe TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: * T6 V+ e8 a! v# I% W, l" d TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 42784 C5 q: Z% Z1 t