KILL = 122. An overflow of TACS storage space has occurred, for TACS table number 7. For a definition of such storage, see ) I* M- j8 ` X& }"ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" in Section II-A of the EMTP Rule Book. The problem is with a sub-table, really, a partition of size& C2 A) K4 x, D6 w7 w0 @5 A
24955 within EMTP List 19 (which allocates total TACS storage). Since the List 19 space can be allocated among TACS tables at: j0 v6 D& @9 }' d/ S
execution time (using "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS"), it may not actually be necessary to increase List 19. For Salford EMTP, 2 ~* g* ?" Q6 g+ ?$ hdynamic dimensioning allows an expansion of List 19 at the start of execution (by changing LISTSIZE.DAT). But other systems ! b2 O6 ^6 r [! Arequire a compiler, linker, and variable-dimensioning program VARDIM. If "ABSOLUTE TACS DIMENSIONS" has been used, the % L; }# ~# k' m1 P3 s! v4 k"Present figure" for List 19 will show the total working space that is required for the user-requested dimensions, and this should ) o" L7 ^! w& e! ~* Lbe compared with the available total space of List 19. On the other hand, if it is "RELATIVE TACS DIMENSIONS" that is used, the4 h* W+ [4 R* g7 _( L6 X
"Present figure" will simply equal the limit, always. In any case, the user can allocate the available space among the different) _ s8 y+ Y5 r
TACS tables only if he knows the multiplicity of each. These are as follows:1 b! L' X% ]2 s$ @3 x4 p, g
TACS Table Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8$ b( q0 ]! }2 v y) h" f
REAL multiplicity 4 2 0 5 0 0 1 63 y) ^9 l1 ~4 k8 g
INTEGER multiplicity 8 0 2 1 3 1 0 23 Q) ^5 U- `" @2 d3 h2 \8 V! T
Total multiplicity 12 2 2 6 3 1 1 8' I/ B% R, w0 |* a/ h( x. D
The TACS table sizes that just proved to be inadequate were: 6 Y4 y9 x, D S% {" D( Y2 l TACS Table Sizes 1426 6417 7130 652 2139 17825 24955 4278& I% o; p* Q6 a( k) q& s