You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following / L/ [& Q7 S6 e; r' rmessage summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where + k, I* O. O& \1 othe "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card4 N# m: H3 X# g, R; c9 T
is generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been. R* y) L/ O0 v8 {" T3 j! y# n+ |
displayed, so a copy follows:) d7 I# F9 N" V$ |
"14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1." 2 k e `7 S7 m/ Q$ Z$ A# u7 ? KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number $ R& ]+ {$ y. \2 J( p 12 5 4246, ^" `' v5 ~5 {( i7 L9 t5 n
KILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously }( B& c! d/ D$ R7 H% ]
defined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect! ^0 q8 W; t% C" |- l
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data5 y+ T" X) @+ D% d& d9 H
case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or; z5 u$ N$ t) E0 g
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.