You lose, fella. The EMTP logic has detected an error condition, and is now going to terminate program execution. The following % c' r. V( P0 |message summarizes the circumstances leading to this situation. Where an otherwise-unidentified data card is referred to, or where 9 i( X( [0 `3 P. t6 r1 Nthe "last" card is mentioned, it is the most recently read card of the input data that is meant. The 80-column image of this card% X. K' ^1 X# A; S" [+ v
is generally the last one printed out prior to this termination message. But possibly this last-read card has not yet been 0 p5 h" t/ p7 k6 Gdisplayed, so a copy follows: 2 z. v; b! o+ @' }# M0 L% w "14X0184A 0 2.2E5 50. -1. 1."% h3 ]9 |' H& q8 [7 [ w6 X
KILL code number Overlay number Nearby statement number ( u$ q5 N0 e% w B" D+ d$ x5 C0 r 12 5 4246 . {( t: a1 h) |& sKILL = 12. The bus name that was read from columns 3-8 of the last source card is unrecognizable, not having been previously t W$ n; N+ T, M7 P, ]( [
defined by a branch card or a switch card. The name read from the data card is "X0184A". The user is not allowed to connect( U1 k" Y9 p2 N, C3 d# Y/ t* X/ ?
sources to network nodes that are not a part of the network that was previously defined by branch and switch cards of this data $ [5 u, R* Z: T" [case. Any such new node would be completely disconnected from the network, so could not affect the solution. Most probably, one or' x0 i1 v. W4 K: S
more spelling errors (including the positioning of imbedded blanks) have been made in the keying of one or more node names on EMTP data cards.